Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/tdd-red-green-refactornpx skills add loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular --skill tdd-red-green-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angularWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/tdd-red-green-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/tdd-red-green-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/tdd-red-green-refactor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00056 | $0.01670 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00835 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00334 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00167 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-red-green-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD: red / green / refactor / simplify
The four phases (per task)
1. RED — write a failing test
-
Read the task entry in
04-tasks.md. ConfirmTest-IDsandAC-IDs. -
Write the smallest possible test that asserts the behavior described by the AC.
- Annotation block on every
@Testmethod is non-negotiable:@Test→@Tag("AC-NNN")→@DisplayName("..."). Write the@DisplayNamebefore the test body — the act of articulating the display name forces clarity about what the test verifies. Format for AC-traced tests:"<T-ID>: given <precondition>, when <action>, then <outcome>". Short BDD-style sentence is acceptable for utility/regression tests not tied to a specific AC. (Project rule:feedback_displayname_on_every_test.md.)
- Annotation block on every
-
Run only that test (
mvn -Dtest=ClassName#method test). -
The test must fail, and the failure must be for the right reason (the asserted behavior is missing, not a typo or compilation error).
-
Append a
redblock to05-implementation-log.mdwith the failing command and the first 10 lines of the failure output. -
Update
.specs/<id>/.tdd-state.json:{ "active_task": "T-001", "tasks": { "T-001": { "phase": "red", "red_at": "2026-04-18T10:00:00Z", "red_test_signature": "...", "red_failure_excerpt": "..." } } }
The block-impl-without-failing-test hook reads this file. No src/main/** edit is allowed unless phase == red and red_failure_excerpt is non-empty.
2. GREEN — minimum production code
- Edit only files in the task's
Files in scope. The hook enforces this. - Write the minimum code to make the failing test pass. No speculative features. No "while I'm here" cleanups.
- Re-run the test (
mvn -Dtest=...). It must pass. - Run the module's full Surefire suite to ensure no regression (
mvn -q test -pl <module>). - Append a
greenblock to05-implementation-log.md. - Set
.tdd-state.jsonphasetogreen.
3. REFACTOR — improve internals, hold behavior
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 114 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 7ba01eca068f
tdd-red-green-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular (58 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,670 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
spec-kitty-mission-review
Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift, risks, and security. Triggers: "review the merged mission", "post-merge mission review", "verify the completed mission", "audit the mission implementation", "mission-level acceptance review"…
spec-kitty-runtime-next
Drive the canonical spec-kitty next --mission control loop for mission advancement. Load agent profiles at init, apply action-scoped doctrine context at each step boundary, and pull specific tactics/directives on demand. Triggers: "run the next step", "what should runtime do next", "advance the mission", "what is the…
spec-kitty-mission-system
Understand how Spec Kitty missions work: the 4 built-in mission types, how they define workflows via step contracts and action indices, how missions and work packages relate, how templates are resolved through the 6-tier chain, and how doctrine artifacts (procedures, tactics, directives) compose mission behavior.…
spec-kitty-git-workflow
Understand how Spec Kitty manages git: what git operations Python handles automatically, what agents must do manually, worktree lifecycle, auto-commit behavior, merge execution, and the safe-commit pattern. Triggers: "how does spec-kitty use git", "worktree management", "auto-commit", "who commits what", "git…