Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add loncadev/baron --skill task-startgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loncadev/baronWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loncadev/baron/task-start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loncadev/baron/task-start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loncadev/baron/task-start/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loncadev/baron/task-start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loncadev/baron/task-start.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01516 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00606 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00303 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
task-start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Start a task (existing work item)
Run the task-start recipe as ONE deterministic call, then sync the local working tree. The engine enforces the provider-side order (load → branch → in_progress → assign to you → comment); your job is the inputs, the local git, the ownership check, and the briefing.
Steps
-
Resolve the issue id from the user's words (
123,AB#123, or a work-item URL → extract the integer). Ask only if genuinely absent. -
Preflight local git (local git is YOUR job, not Baron's): run
git status --porcelain— if dirty, stop and ask the user to commit/stash first. Never start work on a dirty tree. -
Run the recipe — call
baron_recipe_runwith the only input it declares:{ "name": "task-start", "inputs": { "issueId": "<id>" } }The engine loads the item, creates the canonical branch (
<prefix>/<id>-<slug>, derived by Baron's core so every agent picks the same name), moves it toin_progress, assigns it to you (issue.assign @me), and comments the branch on the item. Starting a task makes it yours. -
If it stops on the ownership guard, ask — never take over silently. The recipe refuses only when the item is assigned to someone else, with
RECIPE_REQUIRE: "AB#N is assigned to<them>, not you (<you>). Assign it to yourself first…". On that error:- Ask the user (AskUserQuestion: "AB#N is assigned to
<them>. Take it over and start?" → Take over / Cancel). - On Take over →
baron_issue_write { op: "assign", id: "<id>", assignee: "@me" }, then re-run the recipe from step 3 (the guard now passes because the item is yours). - On Cancel → stop. Do not start, do not reassign.
An unassigned item, or one already yours, never hits this — it just starts. So re-running task-start on your own work is silent and idempotent.
- Ask the user (AskUserQuestion: "AB#N is assigned to
-
Sync the local checkout to the branch Baron created on the provider:
git fetch origin && git switch <branch-name-from-the-result> -
Pull into the active sprint if needed (sprint providers only): compare the item's
iterationwith the active sprint. If it's in a past iteration or has none while a sprint is active (baron_issue_read op=iterations→ the one withcurrent: true), ask whether to pull it in, and on yes callbaron_issue_write { op: "set_iteration", id, iteration: "@current" }. If no sprint is current, skip silently. (This is the "scope creep" checkpoint — the user opts in by pulling mid-sprint.) -
Understand the work before coding — read the whole item, not just the title. Baron's read already gives you the
body(a Bug's repro steps, otherwise the description), type, labels, and parent. Gather the rest so you start informed, using the provider's read/explore tools:- Comments / discussion on the item — decisions, gotchas, prior attempts, review feedback.
- Attachments (specs, screenshots, logs, stack traces) — open the ones that look relevant.
- Extra native fields the body doesn't carry — a Bug's System Info, Acceptance Criteria, and any custom fields.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 5467370b4283
task-start is a skill published in the GitHub repository loncadev/baron (1 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,516 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pipeline-summary
Create a GitHub issue and PR summarizing pipeline bugs and fixes. Use when a pipeline run completes with accumulated bug fixes on a feature branch.
mcloud-local
Execute mcloud local build to reproduce a Cloud build on the local machine. Use when debugging a build-failed deployment without pushing to the tracked branch, iterating on a build fix, or testing build-variable changes locally. Requires Docker and must run inside the project's Git repo.
task
Create one or more tasks via wade task create — for a single bug/feature OR a full plan/PRD breakdown. This is the STANDALONE task-creation workflow, used whenever the user directly asks to create a task/issue outside a wade plan session. Assesses scope, proposes a single- or multi-issue breakdown with reasoning, gets…
feedback-fix-review
Review feedback-driven corrections for verified defects and direct regressions.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
resolve-handoff
Emit the complete Resolve handoff with exact modes, outcomes, test evidence, and publication state.