Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lookatitude/guild/guild-qualitynpx skills add lookatitude/guild --skill guild-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lookatitude/guildWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lookatitude/guild/guild-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lookatitude/guild/guild-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lookatitude/guild/guild-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00141 | $0.03239 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00071 | $0.01620 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00648 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00324 |
Grade A, and why
guild-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
guild:quality
Realizes DI-2 (full Quality skill) (decisions/di1-di6-contracts.md)
against the frozen guild.quality.v1 (./quality-contract.md §"guild.quality.v1 fields";
predicate ./quality-contract.md §"ReleaseGate predicate"). Flow:
SignalScan → SelectMatrix → RunChecks → G-quality → ReleaseGate. Lean playbook
here; mechanics, full pass_when, and the ReleaseGate truth-table in
./quality-mechanics.md (open per step — behaviour identical).
When to use it
At the quality phase: derive the check matrix from on-disk signals, run discovered harnesses under sandbox + canonical budget, collect the advisory G-quality trail, and compute (never ask) a release recommendation over the full disposition enum.
When not to use it
- Operations / runbooks (release, monitoring, incident, rollback, maintenance)
→
guild:operations. - Authoring/installing a test harness →
qa-*specialists; this skill runs only discovered harnesses, never authors or installs. - Initiative closure (D8 close-gate) →
InitiativeCloseout; this skill only supplies the quality evidence Operations reads.
Required inputs
- A passing
.guild/runs/<run-id>/verify.md(the build phase'sguild:verify-doneoutput). Quality runs after a passing verify-done, never instead (invariant 4,./quality-contract.md §"Lifecycle ordering"): absent or failing ⇒ route-back to Development — do not proceed silently. An explicit operator decision to proceed without it MUST be recorded (name + reason) in the quality report. task_runpermission envelope + the immutable always-ask hard set (./quality-contract.md §"task_run envelope & always-ask hard set", which citesscripts/lib/permission-policy-schema.ts).- Canonical budget
defaults.quality.budgetby pointer to./quality-contract.md §Budget(numbers never restated). - Signal rules
./quality-contract.md §selection; frozenguild.quality.v1(./quality-contract.md §"guild.quality.v1 fields", pointer only).
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 214 lines · 141 tokens per session scan A fe695dbeaa2e
guild-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository lookatitude/guild (7 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 141 tokens to every session and 3,239 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
convex-add
Add a capability to the CURRENT Convex app — consults the served Convex capability catalog for always-current procedures (billing, crons, auth, agent, search, …); falls back to built-in hosting or @convex-dev component search. TRIGGER when the user runs /add, or asks to add hosting/publishing or any backend capability…
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
Use when evaluating A-share limit-up (涨停板) setups through Chen Hao's sentiment and momentum lens: market emotion cycles, board strength, follow-through, and short-term aggressive momentum trading.
trading-risk-gate
Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
multi-expert-analyzer
针对通用问题进行多领域专家联合分析, 综合稿产生前必经 fact-checker 与 red-team 两道独立校验。适用场景: 用户提出跨领域或不确定领域的复杂问题, 需要从多个专家角度分别搜证并相互校验后综合成文, 例如该不该买房、该不该跳槽、是否进入某个赛道等。触发关键词: 多角度分析、专家分析、综合分析、多视角、跨领域分析、从不同角度看、深度分析。问题只属于单一明确领域时, 优先使用该领域的专门 skill, 例如纯财务用 finance-core-analysis、纯技术用 software-architect。输出 (全部 markdown 保存到当前项目 markdown/ 目录): (1) 每位专家的中间分析稿…