Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add loopdive/js2 --skill merge-wavegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loopdive/js2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loopdive/js2/merge-wave)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loopdive/js2/merge-wave"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loopdive/js2/merge-wave/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loopdive/js2/merge-wave"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loopdive/js2/merge-wave.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01566 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00626 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
merge-wave scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Merge Wave Protocol
Triage every open PR that has finished sharded test262 CI, compute its real net delta, and execute a ranked merge order in one pass.
When to use
- Multiple PRs ready to merge after a morning of dev work
- After a sprint's worth of issues finished CI at roughly the same time
- When you want to cross a pass-rate milestone in one batch
Step 1: Gather candidate PRs
gh pr list --limit 20 --json number,title,headRefName,mergeable,mergeStateStatus
Filter to PRs with mergeStateStatus: UNSTABLE | CLEAN | BEHIND — skip DIRTY (conflict, ping dev to refresh) and DRAFT.
Step 2: Download every PR's merged-report artifact
The sharded workflow uploads test262-merged-report per run. Find each PR's run ID via the merge shard reports check:
mkdir -p output/pr-artifacts
for pr in <LIST>; do
run_id=$(gh pr view $pr --json statusCheckRollup --jq '.statusCheckRollup[] | select(.name=="merge shard reports") | .detailsUrl' | grep -oE 'runs/[0-9]+' | head -1 | cut -d/ -f2)
mkdir -p output/pr-artifacts/pr-$pr
gh run download $run_id -n test262-merged-report -D output/pr-artifacts/pr-$pr >/dev/null 2>&1
done
Artifact filenames: test262-report-merged.json, test262-regressions.txt, test262-results-merged.jsonl.
Step 3: Compute and rank net deltas
BASELINE=$(python3 -c "import json; d=json.load(open('benchmarks/results/test262-current.json')); print(d['summary']['pass'])")
for pr in <LIST>; do
rpt=output/pr-artifacts/pr-$pr/test262-report-merged.json
[ -f "$rpt" ] && python3 -c "
import json
d=json.load(open('$rpt'))
s=d['summary']
delta=s['pass']-$BASELINE
print(f'PR #$pr pass={s[\"pass\"]} delta={delta:+d} ce={s[\"compile_error\"]}')
"
done | sort -t= -k3 -n -r
Step 4: Classify each PR
Thresholds (tune per context):
| Delta | Action |
|---|---|
| < −500 | CATASTROPHIC → close immediately with diagnosis. Do NOT merge. |
| −500 to −20 | Real regression → close, open follow-up issue, ask dev to investigate root cause |
| −20 to +20 | MARGINAL → check if regressions are false positives; if yes merge, if no close |
| +20 to +100 | GOOD → sample regressions, admin-merge if regressions are false positives or acceptable |
| +100+ | STRONG → admin-merge, flag regressions in a follow-up issue |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 6caa2043fe8a
merge-wave is a skill published in the GitHub repository loopdive/js2 (67 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,566 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
insta-snapshots
Review and update Oxc Insta snapshots non-interactively after expected output changes or snapshot test failures.
maintaining-python-tests
Maintains existing pytest and Django test suites without weakening correctness. Use when asked to reduce Python test runtime or CI work, investigate slow pytest families, remove stale migration tests, consolidate repeated setup, improve Python test ownership, or measure whether a test optimization worked after merge.…
qa-team
Multi-agent QA review team for code changes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my code", "run QA", "qa-team", "review this branch", "code review", "check my changes", or wants a comprehensive multi-perspective code review of the current branch's changes. Spawns parallel specialist agents…
github-copilot-upgrader
Use this to update the Github Copilot CLI/SDK.
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
draft-release-notes
Author the committed release-notes file for a Prisma 8 release (stable or 8.0.0-rc.N) by enumerating the merged PRs since the previous release v tag (stable or -rc.N), resolving opaque TML-NNNN: titles via Linear context (never copied verbatim), triaging public-worthiness, and writing categorized notes — breaking…