Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills --skill market-capture-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lossless-group/lossless-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills/market-capture-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills/market-capture-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills/market-capture-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills/market-capture-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills/market-capture-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00172 | $0.01761 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00881 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
market-capture-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Market Capture Analysis
The first foundational VC question
There are really only two questions a venture investor is asking:
- How big can it get? ← this skill
- How fast can it get that big? ← sibling skill [[timeline-scenario-analysis]]
This skill codifies the analytical structure for question 1. It is deliberately a static, if-then picture — it does not yet involve time. It is the size of the prize at each penetration step, with every assumption named so the reader can react to it. The companion timeline-scenario skill is what stress-tests the path to any cell in the grid. Doing this skill without its sibling produces a destination with no route; see Why this skill alone is incomplete below.
Terminology note: this document uses the standard SAM / SOM / TAM triad (Serviceable Addressable Market / Serviceable Obtainable Market / Total Addressable Market). The author's original term
TOMis parked here as a seam: ifTOMmeans a distinct fourth concept (e.g., Total Obtainable Market — wider than SOM, narrower than SAM), it can be reintroduced as a fourth tier in a later version. Until then, the three-tier standard is used.
What it answers
Given the company's existing pricing (or stated pricing assumptions) and existing business model, what is their top-line revenue and EBITDA at increasing levels of market penetration?
Inputs
| Input | Source |
|---|---|
| Pricing | Stated price card, contract data, or explicit assumption flagged as such |
| Business model | Subscription / transaction / take-rate / per-seat / etc. — must be named, not implied |
| Unit of sale | Whatever the company actually sells (seats, contracts, transactions, GMV, gallons) — not a generic "customer" |
| EBITDA margin assumption | At-scale or stage-appropriate; cite the comparable if it isn't the company's own |
| SAM | Serviceable Addressable Market — the portion of TAM reachable with the current product and business model |
| SOM | Serviceable Obtainable Market — the portion of SAM realistically capturable given competition, distribution, and execution constraints |
| TAM | Total Addressable Market — total demand if 100% share |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 103 lines · 172 tokens per session scan A e1312f7090bf
market-capture-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository lossless-group/lossless-agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 172 tokens to every session and 1,761 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
session-review
End-of-session adversarial review loop. Assemble the session's work into a role-assigned, self-contained brief, then run independent reviewers in parallel — an isolated code-reader (the idea-validator agent) that reads the ACTUAL files and web-checks technology currency, plus an external-family model if you have one …
memory-audit
Audit MEMORY.md against the memory discipline — oversized sections, settled multi-session patterns that belong in knowledge/concepts/, stacked chronicle blocks, stale entries. Produces a move plan as a table for approval, then executes the approved moves atomically. Use when the SessionStart hook reports a tripped…
second-opinion
Cross-check the agent's own answer with independent reviewers before bringing it to the user. Use when the user says 'second opinion', 'sanity check', 'cross-check', 'am I missing something', 'stress-test', 'devil's advocate', 'run a full review', 'this is important', 'high-stakes', 'help me choose between', 'critique…
close-session
An end-of-session workflow that reviews new lessons, asks before promoting repeated patterns, refreshes memory files, and writes a handoff.
ios26-api-reference
Authoritative iOS/macOS/watchOS 26 API reference with 3-tier smart loading. Prevents crashes from hallucinated APIs. Trigger on ANY code involving FoundationModels, SpeechTranscriber, SpeechAnalyzer, @Generable, LanguageModelSession, glassEffect, SwiftData, @Observable, Live Activity, App Intents, Vision…
next-cache-components
Next.js 16 Cache Components guidance. Use when refactoring React Server Components for performance, debugging Partial Prerendering (PPR) issues, or applying the use cache directive, cacheLife, cacheTag, updateTag, and revalidateTag. Also use when deciding whether data should be static, cached, or dynamic, or when…