Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes --skill cost-aware-llm-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cost-aware-llm-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cost-aware-llm-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cost-aware-llm-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cost-aware-llm-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cost-aware-llm-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
cost-aware-llm-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to cost-aware-llm-pipeline — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cost-Aware LLM Pipeline
Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
When to Activate
- Building applications that call LLM APIs (Claude, GPT, etc.)
- Processing batches of items with varying complexity
- Need to stay within a budget for API spend
- Optimizing cost without sacrificing quality on complex tasks
Core Concepts
1. Model Routing by Task Complexity
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
MODEL_SONNET = "claude-sonnet-4-6"
MODEL_HAIKU = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
_SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD = 10_000 # chars
_SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD = 30 # items
def select_model(
text_length: int,
item_count: int,
force_model: str | None = None,
) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
if force_model is not None:
return force_model
if text_length >= _SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD or item_count >= _SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD:
return MODEL_SONNET # Complex task
return MODEL_HAIKU # Simple task (3-4x cheaper)
2. Immutable Cost Tracking
Track cumulative spend with frozen dataclasses. Each API call returns a new tracker — never mutates state.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostRecord:
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostTracker:
budget_limit: float = 1.00
records: tuple[CostRecord, ...] = ()
def add(self, record: CostRecord) -> "CostTracker":
"""Return new tracker with added record (never mutates self)."""
return CostTracker(
budget_limit=self.budget_limit,
records=(*self.records, record),
)
@property
def total_cost(self) -> float:
return sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
@property
def over_budget(self) -> bool:
return self.total_cost > self.budget_limit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 193 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A dbf15fe07cb1
cost-aware-llm-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to cost-aware-llm-pipeline, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
super-ai-ml-foundation
AI/ML foundations: model selection, prompt design, RAG, embeddings, and vector search. Use for core AI app design and build.
implementing-llm-guardrails-for-security
Implements input and output validation guardrails for LLM-powered applications to prevent prompt injection, data leakage, toxic content generation, and hallucinated outputs. Builds a security validation pipeline using NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails Colang definitions, custom Python validators for PII detection and content…
cost-aware-llm-pipeline
A planning guide for choosing language models and managing the amount of conversation context used by an AI coding workflow. It groups tasks by complexity and gives rules for avoiding context overflow during long sessions.
llm-patterns
AI-first application patterns, LLM testing, prompt management.
prompting
Guide for writing effective system prompts for LLM agents. Use when creating or editing system prompts for applications, agent configurations, or development tools.
few-shot-examples
Curated few-shot examples for construction AI tasks: classification, extraction, analysis. Domain-specific examples for improved LLM performance.