Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LS-SIEM-LLP/qa-probe --skill verify-changegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LS-SIEM-LLP/qa-probeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ls-siem-llp/qa-probe/verify-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ls-siem-llp/qa-probe/verify-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ls-siem-llp/qa-probe/verify-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ls-siem-llp/qa-probe/verify-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ls-siem-llp/qa-probe/verify-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00578 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
verify-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verify a change with qa-probe
Use this after you edit frontend or backend code in a project that has a qa-probe.config.js
(or after the user asks whether the running app still works).
Run it
From the project root, with the files you changed (comma separated, relative to the project root):
npx -y [email protected] verify --files path/one.tsx,path/two.py --json
- Leave out
--filesto use the files changed in git. - Add
--allto probe every known endpoint. - Add
--strictwhen "inconclusive" should count as a failure (for example in CI). - If it says there is no graph yet, run
npx -y [email protected] analyzeonce, ornpx -y [email protected] run. - To check the setup first:
npx -y [email protected] doctor.
qa-probe needs a config file and a backend it can reach. If the project has no qa-probe.config.js,
tell the user and point them to https://github.com/LS-SIEM-LLP/qa-probe#readme. Never guess or invent
credentials; the test account belongs in the project's own config or environment.
Read the result honestly
The JSON has verdict, confidence, endpoints, notChecked and summary.
- pass: at least one affected endpoint was verified healthy and none is broken. Look at
notCheckedfor what was not exercised (write endpoints are never exercised). - fail: something probed live is broken. Report the endpoint, its status and
fixHint, and fix it before saying the change works. The command also exits with a non-zero code. - inconclusive: nothing affected could be verified. Do not claim success. Say what could not be
checked, then try
--allor ask the user.
A 200 response with no data, a 401 or 403 for the test account, and long-lived streams are reported as
not verified, never as failures. Files that map to no page or endpoint are listed in notChecked
instead of being guessed at.
qa-probe never changes data and never edits source files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 45 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 1c3ee9e537ed
verify-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository LS-SIEM-LLP/qa-probe (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 578 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-10.
verify-change compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| verify-changeLS-SIEM-LLP/qa-probe | Skill | 2 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 66 | Claude Code |
| playwright-cliVoltAgent/voltagent | Skill | 11k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| verify-bbget-bb/bb | Skill | 5.3k | today | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code, Codex |
| create-verification-skillget-bb/bb | Skill | 5.3k | today | MIT | A | 57 | Claude Code, Codex |
| maintain-verification-skillget-bb/bb | Skill | 5.3k | today | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| JMeter Load TestingPramodDutta/qaskills | Skill | 248 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code, Codex |
| api-testingidavidov13/agentic-playwright | Skill | 280 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code, Codex |