ai-instructions: Skill for Claude Code

.cursor/skills/spring-review-qa/SKILL.md

spring-review-qa is a skill for Claude Code, Cursor from lsampaioweb/ai-instructions. It costs 53 tokens per session (440 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only quality-assurance reviewer for changed files in a Spring Boot project. Quality assurance means checking that software follows defined rules and standards.

In plain words
What is it for?
It reviews files after implementation using the project’s architecture decision record, changed-file list, and rules mapped to quality assurance.
Why use it?
It identifies code-quality and project-rule violations without editing files, running builds, or depending on outside assumptions.

Skill for Claude CodeCursor

Written for Claude Code and Cursor: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter, but also installed under .cursor/. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

This is lsampaioweb/ai-instructions's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Cursor how to work on ai-instructions itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ai-instructions configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to lsampaioweb/ai-instructions. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/main/.cursor/skills/spring-review-qa/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions

Made for: Claude Code, Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for spring-review-qa

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for spring-review-qa

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 440 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.00440
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00220
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00088
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00044

Measured 11d ago against content hash 6f938d81c96b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

spring-review-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/spring-review-qa/SKILL.md · 47 lines

What it actually says

Spring Review QA

You are the QA reviewer. You verify that reviewed files comply only with project rules mapped to the qa review topic. You do not write code, run builds, or modify files.

  • Obey AGENTS.md (project root) and applicable project rules under .cursor/rules/.
  • Read-only review. Never edit code; only report findings.

Approach

  1. Read the ADR file provided and the list of files under review.
  2. Read .cursor/rules/spring-review-topics.mdc.
  3. Collect the project rules mapped to the qa review topic.
  4. Keep only mapped project rules that apply under the topics file scope-resolution rules.
  5. If the filtered set is empty, respond with STATUS: PASS and an empty ISSUES section.
  6. Read those applicable project rules.
  7. Check the reviewed files against explicit Safety Guards and Rules from those project rules only.
  8. Report every violation found.

Output Format

Respond using exactly this format:

STATUS: PASS | FAIL
ISSUES:
- <relative-file-path>:<line-or-section> — <description of the violated rule and which project rule states it>

If STATUS: PASS, the ISSUES section must be empty.

Constraints

  • DO NOT run build, test, dependency, or environment checks.
  • DO NOT evaluate code against any standard, convention, or best practice that is not explicitly stated in a project rule under .cursor/rules/.
  • DO NOT use pre-trained knowledge about any technology, framework, or language for any decision not covered by a project rule.
  • Report only violations of rules explicitly written in the applicable mapped project rules. Cite the project rule and rule for every issue raised.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 47 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 6f938d81c96b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

spring-review-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository lsampaioweb/ai-instructions (1 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 440 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

adversarial-reviewer

Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.

emdash-cms/emdash · 71 tokens

adk-go-self-review

Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…

google/adk-go · 87 tokens

go-testing

Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 26 tokens

semgrep-rule-variant-creator

Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.

waybarrios/opencode-power-pack · 50 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl

When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.

ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm · 29 tokens