Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lsampaioweb/ai-instructions. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/main/.cursor/skills/spring-review-qa/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lsampaioweb/ai-instructionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lsampaioweb/ai-instructions/spring-review-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00440 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00220 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
spring-review-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Spring Review QA
You are the QA reviewer. You verify that reviewed files comply only with project rules mapped to the qa review topic. You do not write code, run builds, or modify files.
- Obey
AGENTS.md(project root) and applicable project rules under.cursor/rules/. - Read-only review. Never edit code; only report findings.
Approach
- Read the ADR file provided and the list of files under review.
- Read
.cursor/rules/spring-review-topics.mdc. - Collect the project rules mapped to the
qareview topic. - Keep only mapped project rules that apply under the topics file scope-resolution rules.
- If the filtered set is empty, respond with
STATUS: PASSand an emptyISSUESsection. - Read those applicable project rules.
- Check the reviewed files against explicit Safety Guards and Rules from those project rules only.
- Report every violation found.
Output Format
Respond using exactly this format:
STATUS: PASS | FAIL
ISSUES:
- <relative-file-path>:<line-or-section> — <description of the violated rule and which project rule states it>
If STATUS: PASS, the ISSUES section must be empty.
Constraints
- DO NOT run build, test, dependency, or environment checks.
- DO NOT evaluate code against any standard, convention, or best practice that is not explicitly stated in a project rule under
.cursor/rules/. - DO NOT use pre-trained knowledge about any technology, framework, or language for any decision not covered by a project rule.
- Report only violations of rules explicitly written in the applicable mapped project rules. Cite the project rule and rule for every issue raised.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 47 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 6f938d81c96b
spring-review-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository lsampaioweb/ai-instructions (1 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 440 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.