Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ltda3/telco-analytics-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ltda3/telco-analytics-mcp/main/.agents/skills/telco-analytics/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ltda3/telco-analytics-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ltda3/telco-analytics-mcp/telco-analytics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ltda3/telco-analytics-mcp/telco-analytics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ltda3/telco-analytics-mcp/telco-analytics.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01233 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
telco-analytics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 31 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Retention analytics workflow
Use the telco MCP as the governed data plane. The MCP semantic layer is the authority for metric names, definitions, populations, defaults, filters, governance tiers, limitations, and provenance. Do not recreate formulas from this Skill or infer an operating definition from ordinary language alone.
Complete the analysis
- Interpret the business question and identify the supported concept or metric. For a broad governed concept such as “What is churn?”, call
retention_business_overview; it returns the approved default, alternatives, and computed evidence together. The broad churn default is the full-snapshotdataset_churn_share; the Stayed-plus-Churned value is a separately labeled assumed-starting-base proxy. Useretention_check_capabilitybefore answering requests that may require unsupported trends, recurring-revenue movements, causality, forecasts, or scenario arithmetic. Use catalog/context for term discovery and dataset metadata. - Treat catalog results as preparation only. Context structured content is authoritative only for explicit dataset metadata, quality-gate, coverage, lineage, and limitation questions; it is not analytic evidence for a business measure. If the user asks for a business count, rate, share, comparison, ranking, distribution, or finding, complete an analytic MCP call before answering. Never make the user name an MCP tool or metric ID. For an explicit metadata or data-quality question, stop after the appropriate context result unless the user separately asks for an analytic measure; do not add analytic calls merely to restate profile counts.
- Use the narrowest governed analytic tool that answers the question: business overview for broad concepts, metric queries for named aggregates or filters, segment diagnosis for one- or two-dimension grouped comparisons, churn reasons for recorded reason/category distributions or a bounded city breakdown of a selected recorded reason, the separate fairness-audit operation only for aggregate demographic audits, and capability check for unsupported boundaries. The governed catalog also covers customer/service mix shares, source-reported usage, cumulative refund incidence and amounts, retention/joined snapshot proxies, and selected medians; use their returned definitions instead of inventing thresholds, eligibility populations, or bundle formulas. Treat
eligible_populationas records structurally eligible for a measure andqualifying_populationas records matching an outcome predicate; never interchange them. CLTV is a source-provided predicted score with undisclosed formula, units, horizon, and calibration—not currency, realized LTV, or a prediction created by this MCP. The paid internet add-on band counts security, backup, protection, support, and unlimited-data flags; it excludes no-extra-fee streaming flags. Preserve requested filters and grouping only when the contract supports them. Never route fairness dimensions through ordinary actionable diagnosis. - Ground every quantitative claim in the structured analytic result. If the required concept or population is unsupported, say so and offer the closest governed result without inventing a metric.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 31 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 0c9c5646b7cd
telco-analytics is a skill published in the GitHub repository ltda3/telco-analytics-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,233 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…