Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lttr/claude-marketplace --skill next-stepsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lttr/claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lttr/claude-marketplace/next-steps)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lttr/claude-marketplace/next-steps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lttr/claude-marketplace/next-steps/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lttr/claude-marketplace/next-steps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lttr/claude-marketplace/next-steps.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00899 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
next-steps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Next Steps
Read-only status report for one .aiwork/ task folder. Follows the aiwork-protocol skill; changes nothing.
1. Resolve input
$ARGUMENTS is a spec, plan, ticket, or task folder path. A file path resolves to its task folder (a ticket's is the folder above tickets/). With no args, find the most recently modified task folder per aiwork-protocol conventions. Nothing found → say so and stop.
2. Gather
Read frontmatter first, prose only where needed.
intent.md:status(proposed/accepted/declined).spec.md(or the currentplan*.mdwhen there is no spec, skipping any withsuperseded_by):status,blocked_by,verified. Note whether the spec still has open questions, TBDs, or a non-empty Open Concerns section.tickets/, if present: for each ticket its number, title,status(ready/in-progress/done),blocked_by,verified, and the count of ticked vs unticked acceptance criteria. The frontier is everyreadyticket whose blockers are alldone.review*.md: present or not, and itsreviewed_sha.implementation-notes*.md: any entries the human must act on.
Read the vocabulary as the protocol defines it:
- Ticket folders carry the truth in ticket statuses; the spec's own
statusis optional there. - Without tickets, an absent spec
statusmeans unknown, not not-started. agent-donemeans the agent finished and handed over; report it as awaiting the human's check, never as finished.doneon a spec is the human's call.- Older folders may use
draft/active/complete/superseded; map them to the nearest current value and say so.
3. Report
Brief. Print, in order:
- Headline: task folder, then one line — intent status, spec status (or "tickets: N done / M in progress / K ready / J blocked").
- Tickets table when
tickets/exists: number, title, status, blockers, criteria ticked,verifiedpasses. Skip the table for folders without tickets. - Next action, exactly one line, first match wins:
- intent not
accepted→ decide the intent (/aiwork:to-specwaits on it) - no spec and no tickets →
/aiwork:to-spec - spec with open questions / Open Concerns → resolve them;
/aiwork:implement-specstops on them - spec, no tickets, not small →
/aiwork:to-tickets; small →/aiwork:implement <spec> - frontier non-empty →
/aiwork:implement-spec, or/aiwork:implement tickets/<NN>naming the first frontier ticket - a ticket
in-progress→ resume it - all tickets
done, noreview*.md→/aiwork:implement-specruns the wrap-up review - spec
agent-done→ the human exercises the feature and reads the code, then setsdone - spec
done→ all done - spec
blockedor every remaining ticket blocked → name the blocker
- intent not
- Needs a human: only if any exist —
blocked_bycauses, unresolved implementation notes,donetickets with unticked criteria or without an on-appverifiedpass (behaviour/ux/human), a review whosereviewed_shais missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 5fbdd3d5270f
next-steps is a skill published in the GitHub repository lttr/claude-marketplace (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 899 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
issue-triage
Triage Paperclip inbox issues that are stale, blocked, in-review, or assigned-but-not-progressing, and decide a single next action per issue (resume, reassign, unblock, escalate, or close).
multi-agent
A process for coordinating multiple coding agents by splitting work among scouts, workers, reviewers, and repair agents. Each agent has a defined role and task.
tencent-meeting-mcp
A Tencent Meeting assistant for scheduling meetings and working with participants, recordings, transcripts, and AI-generated meeting notes.
flow-next-flow
Use first in a Flow-Next repo for a spec id, change, bug, issue, slow code or metric, cleanup, design fork, dump to explain, repeated mistake, prompt change, what could break, what next. No quick asks.
flow-next-plan
Plan a feature into a flow-next spec with tasks in .flow/. Use when asked to plan, spec out, or break down work (fn-N ids).
project-execution
Executes implementation plans with progress tracking, checkpoint validation, and quality gates. Use after planning is complete and tasks are ready to implement.