Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lubluniky/dale --skill dale-brainstormgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lubluniky/daleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lubluniky/dale/dale-brainstorm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lubluniky/dale/dale-brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lubluniky/dale/dale-brainstorm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lubluniky/dale/dale-brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lubluniky/dale/dale-brainstorm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00454 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00227 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
dale-brainstorm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dale Brainstorm
Think with the user in the current conversation. Build on their language, values, and constraints. Explore meaningfully different possibilities before converging; adapt to their requested phase rather than imposing rounds.
Keep live options, criteria, assumptions, and rejected alternatives in the conversation. Summarize when useful, not after every exchange. Ask at most one substantive question per response when its answer changes the discussion. State the strongest credible counterargument before endorsing a direction. Separate evidence, inference, and preference.
Gather evidence without taking over
Read relevant authorized sources directly when a quick check grounds the idea. For a substantial, separable factual question, a read-only subagent may help while the conversation continues. Give it a concrete evidence output and minimum context; inherit model and effort and forbid further delegation. Do not create agents merely to simulate opinions, taste, or disagreement. Use a separate Codex task only when the user explicitly asks for one. Read model-routing.md only for requested routing.
Converge when asked
A request to recommend, choose, summarize, or plan authorizes that phase. A request to implement authorizes leaving brainstorming for the requested work; do not demand a special exit phrase or repeat permission already given. Otherwise keep this discussion from turning into file edits, tickets, external messages, or an assumed implementation commitment.
When asked for a recommendation, give the leading direction, concrete reasons, strongest counterargument, and material uncertainties. Provide an implementation plan only when requested. Persist a discussion artifact only when requested. Do not automatically hand off to another Dale workflow.
Cancellation and changed scope
On cancellation or revoked scope, interrupt affected workers immediately before other work, invalidate pending outputs, and preserve existing changes. Update or disable related scheduled work only within the user's cancellation scope. For a correction, stop conflicting work first, then send the revised contract; accept subsequent results only against the current request and artifact state.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · -89 lines · -64 tokens per session ec5e38a991a2
- 12d ago First seen · 137 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A db92606c741c
dale-brainstorm is a skill published in the GitHub repository lubluniky/dale (51 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 454 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-creation-skill
Procedural guide for creating new agents from templates when project complexity requires delegation.
memory-fabric
Knowledge graph orchestration layer with entity extraction, natural language query parsing, deduplication (>85% similarity), and cross-reference boosting. Unifies search results ranked by recency, relevance, and authority. Use when designing memory retrieval, building entity graphs, or optimizing knowledge graph…
loop-graph
Compile one durable loop-graph run into executor, ledger, directives, ops, and supervisor artifacts under a dated .longgraph directory, then present copy-ready host prompts. Use directly for a custom multi-round shape with gated milestones, independent audit, cross-host execution, or durable state; focused sibling…
longgraph
Route and author durable long-horizon loop-graph runs. Use for multi-round work needing durable state, gated milestones, owner boundaries, host switching, or independent audit. Route code cleanup to /loop-converge, feature requirements to /loop-deliver, and evidence-backed solution comparison to /loop-research; use…
loop-converge
Author and optionally direct-launch a two-node loop-graph run whose North Star is code convergence — delete unused code, merge duplicates, reuse, slim. Use when the user invokes /loop-converge, or asks to loop on dead code, duplication, unused exports, DRY cleanup, or merging twin implementations. Starts the owner…
loop-deliver
Author and optionally direct-launch a two-node loop-graph run for implementing a product or engineering requirement through verified vertical slices. Use when a requested feature, integration, migration, or behavior change needs multiple rounds, durable acceptance proof, and independent audit. Not for code cleanup…