Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp --skill tdmcp-implementation-learninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-implementation-learning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-implementation-learning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-implementation-learning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-implementation-learning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-implementation-learning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01989 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00994 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-implementation-learning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-implementation-learning — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
tdmcp-implementation-learning - post-implementation learning harness
Coordinate a focused study of a completed tdmcp implementation, then turn the evidence into a prioritized improvement backlog. This harness answers: "What did this implementation teach us, and what should tdmcp improve next?"
Use it after a feature has already been built, merged, tested in TouchDesigner, used with hardware, reviewed in a PR, or exercised in a real installation.
Boundary
This harness studies and routes improvements. It does not own arbitrary feature implementation.
- Shipped/merged implementation learning:
tdmcp-implementation-learning. - Chosen new feature build:
tdmcp-pipeline. - Broad repo quality or command health:
tdmcp-quality-audit. - Known coverage gaps:
tdmcp-test-coverage. - Docs, roadmap, or changelog sync:
tdmcp-docs-roadmap-update. - Continued Kinect wall harp work:
tdmcp-kinect-wall-harp.
Execution mode: sub-agent fan-out -> fan-in
No TeamCreate. Use coordinated sub-agents with file handoffs.
- Scope: lead only. Determine target feature, evidence sources, and artifact directory.
- Study: sub-agent fan-out. Code, runtime, and quality surfaces can be inspected independently.
- Synthesis: one sub-agent. One owner dedupes findings and ranks next actions.
- Handoff: lead only. The user gets a compact decision-ready report.
All agent calls use model: "opus" unless the caller has a stricter local
policy.
Agent roster
tdmcp-implementation-learning-lead:_workspace/implementation-learning/<slug>/00_scope.mdand final handoff.tdmcp-implementation-cartographer:_workspace/implementation-learning/<slug>/01_map.md.tdmcp-implementation-runtime-analyst:_workspace/implementation-learning/<slug>/02_runtime_lessons.md.tdmcp-implementation-quality-analyst:_workspace/implementation-learning/<slug>/03_quality_gaps.md.tdmcp-implementation-synthesizer:_workspace/implementation-learning/<slug>/04_backlog.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 236 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 152515235e66
tdmcp-implementation-learning is a skill published in the GitHub repository lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,989 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-implementation-learning, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…