Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcpnpx agentmods add skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-test-coverageWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-test-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-test-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00653 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-test-coverage — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
tdmcp-test-coverage
Use this skill for coverage-improvement work in this repository. The goal is more tested behavior, not prettier percentages.
Phase 0 - Context
- Read
AGENTS.md,package.json,vitest.config.ts, and the nearest tests. - Run
npm run coverage:harnessunless the user asked for a static-only pass. - Read
_workspace/coverage/latest.md. - Treat the actionable scope as
src/**/*.ts;src/knowledge/data/**is generated reference data and is intentionally excluded.
Phase 1 - Select gaps
Choose one to three independent gaps. Prefer seams where a test can lock a real contract:
- CLI/config: parsing, defaulting, env precedence, diagnostics, and exit behavior.
- Resource/knowledge loaders: URI matching, malformed input, ranking, and stable result shape.
- Tool implementations: Zod defaults, bridge payloads, warnings, and
isErrorpaths using msw. - Server/client boundaries: offline TD behavior, auth forwarding, timeout/retry, event streaming, and transport setup.
Skip generated data, docs-only files, and import-only tests.
Phase 2 - Build tests
For parallel work, spawn tdmcp-coverage-writer agents with one seam each. Give
each writer:
- target file(s) and nearest existing test to mirror;
- behavior to assert;
- expected failure mode or branch to cover;
- exact narrow command to run.
The lead is the single writer for shared config, package scripts, and harness docs. Do not let multiple agents edit the same test file.
Phase 3 - Verify
Run narrow tests first. Then run:
npm run typecheck
npm run build
./node_modules/.bin/biome check .
npm run coverage:harness
npm run validate:recipes
npm run test:bridge
If a gate fails, fix forward. Do not lower coverage thresholds, delete assertions, or exclude executable code to pass.
Phase 4 - Report
Write _workspace/coverage/wave-<date>.md with:
- starting and ending coverage summary;
- tests added and behaviors covered;
- commands run;
- PASS/FAIL/UNVERIFIED buckets;
- next suggested gaps from
_workspace/coverage/latest.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 79 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A f9a7fa65be19
tdmcp-test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-test-coverage, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.