Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LucasSantana-Dev/sharekit --skill resumegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LucasSantana-Dev/sharekitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/resume)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/resume"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/resume/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/resume"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/resume.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00326 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
resume scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
resume
Recover state before doing new work.
Read order
~/.claude/handoffs/<project>/latest.md~/.claude/handoffs/latest.md- newest plan in
.claude/plans/or.agents/plans/ .agents/memory/in-progress.md- current git branch, status, and open PRs
Post-incident check
After loading the handoff, scan for OPEN incident flags (P0/P1 failures). If present, surface before anything else: a committed root-cause artifact (ADR or incident-log) is required before the next task proceeds. Do not silently skip an open incident flag and start a new task.
Output
Return:
- active objective
- repo, branch, worktree
- what is already done
- what remains
- exact next action
- any open incident flags (if found)
Failure / Stop Conditions
- If no handoff, plan, or git context is found → surface "no context found" and ask the user for orientation rather than guessing an objective.
- Do not invent a task when all context sources are empty.
Pair with standards
standards/session-budget.md— defines when to create checkpoints/handoffs (70%/90% context thresholds) that resume rehydrates from
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 000c328caf16
resume is a skill published in the GitHub repository LucasSantana-Dev/sharekit (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 326 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
reflect
Use Recall Reflect to review AI coding workflow history as a conversation-first timeline and discuss observed patterns before changing behavior. Trigger when the user asks to reflect on a project, review AI coding workflow, inspect workflow friction, discuss repeated corrections, review handoffs, or explore possible…
obsidian
Use the official Obsidian CLI (v1.12+) to manage vaults, notes, daily notes, search, tasks, tags, properties, links, templates, sync, publish, and workspaces. Use when the user mentions Obsidian, vaults, notes, or wants to automate note-taking and knowledge base workflows.
knowledge-session-state-and-context-session-catalog-fork-rewind-and-export
A session-lifecycle component for finding, resuming, archiving, branching, rewinding, searching, and exporting saved conversations.
compact-now
Operator-triggered proactive compaction — Chrono externalizes load-bearing state (active decisions, open tasks, next action) to a snapshot + a durable Vault learning note before invoking Claude Code's native /compact, then resumes from the snapshot. Use when the operator says "/compact-now" / "compact now" or when…
alive-morning
Morning briefing -- read all walnut states, surface priorities, inbox count, stale walnuts, people nudges.
jumbo-add-guideline
Use liberally when the user expresses a preference about how work should be done — coding style, process, testing approach, communication style. Captures the guideline so future sessions follow it without being told again.