Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lugassawan/swe-workbench/workflow-branch-syncnpx skills add lugassawan/swe-workbench --skill workflow-branch-syncgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lugassawan/swe-workbenchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lugassawan/swe-workbench/workflow-branch-sync)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lugassawan/swe-workbench/workflow-branch-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lugassawan/swe-workbench/workflow-branch-sync.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.05946 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.02973 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00595 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-branch-sync scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow: Branch Sync
Announce at start: "I'm using the workflow-branch-sync skill to bring this branch up to date and help resolve any conflicts."
When to Invoke
- User's branch has fallen behind the default branch and they want it brought up to date.
- User asks for help resolving merge/rebase conflicts, or wants guidance on "which side is correct".
- Invoked by
/swe-workbench:sync.
What This Skill Does NOT Do
- Does not open, merge, or comment on a PR — that is
swe-workbench:workflow-commit-and-pr/ the user's action. - Does not resolve any conflict without first showing both sides and a recommendation with rationale.
- Does not auto-push — ever. The push is a separate, explicitly prompted step at the end.
- Does not rewrite history beyond the single merge or rebase the user asked for.
Sync Contract
Step 1 — Preflight Guard
command -v swe-workbench-skill-script >/dev/null 2>&1 || {
echo "swe-workbench runtime commands not on PATH — reinstall or update the swe-workbench plugin." >&2
exit 1
}
eval "$(swe-workbench-skill-script workflow-branch-sync preflight-guard.sh)"
Emits CURRENT_BRANCH, DEFAULT_BRANCH (detected — never hardcode main), IS_DEFAULT, DETACHED, DIRTY.
IS_DEFAULT=1: refuse. Report "already on$DEFAULT_BRANCH— nothing to sync onto itself" and stop.DETACHED=1: refuse. Report "detached HEAD — checkout a branch first" and stop.DIRTY>0: offer stash-or-abort before touching history —git stash push -u -m "branch-sync: pre-sync stash"if the user opts to stash, otherwise stop and let the user commit or discard first. Never proceed with a dirty tree. If the user stashes, setSTASHED=1— Step 7 restores it before reporting.
Step 2 — Overlap Advisory (optional)
If the rimba MCP server is active in the session, invoke its conflict-check tool with dry_merge: true as an informational heads-up only — it detects cross-worktree file overlaps between rimba-managed worktrees, not the authoritative conflict set for this sync. Surface any overlap it reports, but never block or skip Step 3 on its account. Skip silently if rimba MCP is not active.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 209 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 22721e1631e2
workflow-branch-sync is a skill published in the GitHub repository lugassawan/swe-workbench (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 5,946 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…
brooks-audit
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized…
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…
review
Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when…
skill-review
Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions…
context-anchoring
Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles).…