Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform --skill kimi-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00053 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
kimi-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Kimi Review
Description
Run a code review using Kimi CLI.
Usage
Invoke the Kimi companion script with review mode.
Rules
- Collect git diff before prompting.
- Request structured JSON findings.
- Present results with severity icons.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 16 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 79635fa18834
kimi-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 53 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agents-consilium
Run external coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, native Grok Build, Gemini) as independent reviewers, stateful repository researchers, or single-agent implementers. Use for multi-model opinions and code review, steerable Grok research, full-access delegation, long-running work, or reattaching to delegated…
refactoring-csharp
Rename and refactor C# symbols in a .NET solution or multi-solution monorepo with a one-shot Roslyn CLI. Use when the user asks to rename a symbol, preview impact, update references across a solution, or refactor shared projects across several solutions.
agentic-readiness
Audit and improve repositories for reliable agentic work across Codex and Codex App, Claude Code, and OpenCode. Use when reviewing AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md quality and discovery, instruction routing in monorepos or meta-repos, agent settings, MCP configuration, skills, subagents, context budgets, or repository…
code-that-fits-in-your-head
Software-engineering heuristics based on Mark Seemann's Code That Fits in Your Head (2021), updated for agent-driven development. Use when writing or reviewing code, refactoring accidental complexity or a Big Ball of Mud, controlling technical or architectural debt in generated code, designing APIs and invariants…
application-security-pentesting
Production Application Security (AppSec) standards, OWASP Top 10 vulnerability remediation, SAST/DAST pipeline integration, secure code review, threat modeling, and defensive security posture.
luna
Reviews code for objective correctness, security, and reliability.