Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add luisabwk/kraken --skill code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luisabwk/krakenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luisabwk/kraken/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luisabwk/kraken/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luisabwk/kraken/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luisabwk/kraken/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luisabwk/kraken/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01578 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00631 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00316 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 221 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 82c87fe8c3ed
code-simplifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository luisabwk/kraken (1 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,578 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-codex
Final-gate code review via Codex CLI (codex-5.3, xhigh). Finds bugs, security issues, and regressions before commit. No edits — findings report only.
spec-review-codex
Audit project specs for conflicts, goal drift, ambiguity, and gaps via Codex CLI (gpt-5.2, xhigh). Read-only findings report.
codex-review
Run code reviews with the Codex CLI, prioritizing bugs, regressions, security risks, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, PR review, diff review, or commit-range review via codex.
audit-code-review
Review a PR or diff for correctness, security, and maintainability. Use for a pull request, a named change set, or "review my changes". Repo-wide anti-patterns → audit-code-quality. Bulk transforms → audit-codemod-safety.
audit-codemod-safety
Read-only check that a codemod or bulk transform preserved behavior — compiling is not proof. Use when "did this codemod break anything", "audit this bulk refactor", or before merging a mass find-replace. SQL → plan-data-integrity.
audit-doctrine
Read-only audit of custom lint and ratchet rules: is each rule right on the merits, not just enforced. Use when "is this lint rule wrong", "the ratchet banned a legitimate pattern", or "audit our guardrail doctrine". Enforcement → audit-gate-logic.