Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LuizEduPP/Rememb --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuizEduPP/RemembWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/executing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luizedupp/rememb/executing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luizedupp/rememb/executing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00584 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00234 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
When to Use
Use this skill when you already have a written implementation plan and want to execute it in a separate session with explicit review checkpoints.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Note: This workflow is stronger in environments with isolated-task support. If the current environment offers a more advanced worker-based execution workflow, prefer that option over this linear fallback.
Core Workflow
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce that you are moving into final verification and delivery
- Run the project's normal finish workflow: tests, validation, summary, and delivery options
- If the current host provides a dedicated finishing workflow, use it
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
- Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A beda269a45a7
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository LuizEduPP/Rememb (5 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 584 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prismer-python-debugpy
Debug Python: pdb REPL + debugpy remote (DAP).
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component Prismer HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
firebase-messaging
Use when setting up Firebase Cloud Messaging, managing permissions and tokens, handling background/foreground notification taps, or dispatching messages server-side (HTTP v1).
firebase-cloud-functions
Use when calling callable functions (httpsCallable), passing data to server-side logic, handling function errors/timeouts, configuring regions, or testing with the Emulator Suite.
document-actions
Extract cited facts, obligations, deadlines and proposed actions from documents, preserving OCR uncertainty and reconciling Prismer tasks.
webapp-qa
Perform scoped exploratory QA of a web application, reproduce defects, collect screenshots and console evidence, and deliver a prioritized report.