Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuizEduPP/Remembnpx agentmods add skills/luizedupp/rememb/git-advanced-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/git-advanced-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/git-advanced-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luizedupp/rememb/git-advanced-workflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/git-advanced-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luizedupp/rememb/git-advanced-workflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.02252 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00901 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00450 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
git-advanced-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 413 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Advanced Workflows
Master advanced Git techniques to maintain clean history, collaborate effectively, and recover from any situation with confidence.
When to Use
- Cleaning up commit history before merging
- Applying specific commits across branches
- Finding commits that introduced bugs
- Working on multiple features simultaneously
- Recovering from Git mistakes or lost commits
- Managing complex branch workflows
- Preparing clean PRs for review
- Synchronizing diverged branches
Core Concepts
1. Interactive Rebase
Interactive rebase is the Swiss Army knife of Git history editing.
Common Operations:
pick: Keep commit as-isreword: Change commit messageedit: Amend commit contentsquash: Combine with previous commitfixup: Like squash but discard messagedrop: Remove commit entirely
Basic Usage:
# Rebase last 5 commits
git rebase -i HEAD~5
# Rebase all commits on current branch
git rebase -i $(git merge-base HEAD main)
# Rebase onto specific commit
git rebase -i abc123
2. Cherry-Picking
Apply specific commits from one branch to another without merging entire branches.
# Cherry-pick single commit
git cherry-pick abc123
# Cherry-pick range of commits (exclusive start)
git cherry-pick abc123..def456
# Cherry-pick without committing (stage changes only)
git cherry-pick -n abc123
# Cherry-pick and edit commit message
git cherry-pick -e abc123
3. Git Bisect
Binary search through commit history to find the commit that introduced a bug.
# Start bisect
git bisect start
# Mark current commit as bad
git bisect bad
# Mark known good commit
git bisect good v1.0.0
# Git will checkout middle commit - test it
# Then mark as good or bad
git bisect good # or: git bisect bad
# Continue until bug found
# When done
git bisect reset
Automated Bisect:
# Use script to test automatically
git bisect start HEAD v1.0.0
git bisect run ./test.sh
# test.sh should exit 0 for good, 1-127 (except 125) for bad
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 413 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 9882dca6fccc
git-advanced-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository LuizEduPP/Rememb (5 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,252 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-ops
Close out a local coding task on the bound daemon — stage, commit, branch, merge, push via cloud git — and when a merge conflicts, STOP and escalate with the file list instead of auto-resolving. Push reaches only the bare replica; prod-triggering tags are refused.
release-rollback
Roll a release back for real when post-deploy regression goes red — apc release rollback flips the current version to pulled and the last good version back to current in the release ledger, and (with --mirror) repoints the bare mirror ref. Behind an approval gate; with no previous good version it BLOCKS instead of…
release-tag
Cut a release tag behind a real tier gate and cloud approval readback. The approval, task, approved commit, and resulting tag are bound; self-approval and HEAD drift fail closed. Prod prefixes remain refused.
prismer-github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
releasing-prod
A controlled process for deploying already tested changes to the production environment. Production is the live environment used by users, and this process includes owner approval, database migration checks, deployment, and smoke tests.
pre-pr
Prepare a Honcho change for a pull request to plastic-labs/honcho. Invoke before opening a PR, when drafting a PR body, when asked if a branch is PR-ready, or when filling the pull request template. Checks the linked issue, required tests and docs, then writes Description / Proofs / Fixes.