Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LuizEduPP/Rememb --skill planning-with-filesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuizEduPP/RemembWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/planning-with-files)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/planning-with-files"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luizedupp/rememb/planning-with-files/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luizedupp/rememb/planning-with-files"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luizedupp/rememb/planning-with-files.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01861 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00744 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00372 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
planning-with-files scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
78% identical to planning-with-files — 111 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Planning with Files
Work like Manus: Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."
Overview
Use persistent project files to store task state, discoveries, and progress so long-running work survives context limits and session resets.
Optional Host Integration
Some AI hosts support hooks, tool restrictions, or lifecycle automation. Treat those as optional enhancements, not required behavior. The core workflow in this document should still work in any IDE, editor, CLI, or chat app.
First: Restore Context
Before doing anything else, check if planning files exist and read them:
- If
task_plan.mdexists, readtask_plan.md,progress.md, andfindings.mdimmediately. - Then check for unsynced context from a previous session:
# Linux/macOS
$(command -v python3 || command -v python) <skill-root>/scripts/session-catchup.py "$(pwd)"
# Windows PowerShell
& (Get-Command python -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue).Source "<skill-root>/scripts/session-catchup.py" (Get-Location)
If catchup report shows unsynced context:
- Run
git diff --statto see actual code changes - Read current planning files
- Update planning files based on catchup + git diff
- Then proceed with task
Where Files Go
- Templates are in
<skill-root>/templates/ - Your planning files go in your project directory
| Location | What Goes There |
|---|---|
Skill directory (<skill-root>/) |
Templates, scripts, reference docs |
| Your project directory | task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md |
Quick Start
Before ANY complex task:
- Create
task_plan.md— Use templates/task_plan.md as reference - Create
findings.md— Use templates/findings.md as reference - Create
progress.md— Use templates/progress.md as reference - Re-read plan before decisions — Refreshes goals in attention window
- Update after each phase — Mark complete, log errors
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples.md 4.4 KB
- reference.md 7.9 KB
- scripts/check-complete.ps1 1.8 KB runs code
- scripts/check-complete.sh 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/init-session.ps1 2.4 KB runs code
- scripts/init-session.sh 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/session-catchup.py 15 KB runs code
- templates/findings.md 3.5 KB
- templates/progress.md 3.9 KB
- templates/task_plan.md 4.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 244 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 34b5d25aa646
planning-with-files is a skill published in the GitHub repository LuizEduPP/Rememb (5 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,861 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 78% identical to planning-with-files, differing in 111 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tasks
Manage Prismer workspace tasks across the full Kanban lifecycle — create, list, inspect, update, complete, approve, reject, cancel. Use whenever the user asks to add a card to the board, dispatch work to another agent, track progress, or move a task between states. Executes via the cloud task CLI.
prismer-notion
Notion API + ntn CLI: pages, databases, markdown, Workers.
test-result-feedback
Close the acceptance loop for a tested change — consume the apc test TierResult, map EACH acceptance criterion to a pass/fail outcome from structured fields (never chat text), attach an evidence ref, and write it back to the task. A SUT red is a finding, never softened to green.
doc-sync
Before merge, mechanize Documentation-First — derive the code delta from git diff, then verify required docs are in sync (CHANGELOG, docs/api, CLAUDE.md/ROADMAP). Any SDK-package change must carry a matching CHANGELOG entry + aligned version files. A change that skipped a required doc is flagged as a gap; a…
spec-intake
Turn one atomic feature/gap request into a dispatchable task in a single pass — create the task, write SPEC.md (auto-folded into linkedAssetIds server-side), add acceptance criteria, record provenance. Two-part epics are refused, not silently split.
prismer-teams-meeting-pipeline
Teams meeting summaries, job replay, Graph subscriptions.