Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lukas-grigis/ralphctl. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/main/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lukas-grigis/ralphctlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00468 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verify
Run the project's verification gate as a single command:
pnpm typecheck && pnpm lint && pnpm test
All three MUST pass. If any step fails, report which one, show the error, and stop — don't move on until the failure is addressed.
Why these three, in this order
pnpm typecheck—tsc(noEmitset intsconfig.json). Fastest feedback; catches most issues.pnpm lint— ESLint. Includes the Clean Architecture layer fence (domain → business → integration → application), the no-class fence (outsidedomain/value/error/), the no-barrels fence, and the sibling-isolation rules underintegration/ai/<concept>/. A layer violation shows up here.pnpm test— vitest (vitest run). The full suite, including flow step-order integration tests that lock the architectural shape.
Running them chained with && short-circuits on the first failure, which is what we want.
Not a replacement for
pnpm format:check/pnpm format— Prettier. The pre-commit hook handles staged files; runformat:checkmanually for a full sweep before opening a PR.pnpm deadcode— knip. One-off audit; symbols intentionally exported are whitelisted via@publicJSDoc tag +knip.json#tags: ["-public"].pnpm build—tsup+tsx scripts/build-assets.ts. Only needed before publishing to npm; CI verifies the bundle from arbitrary cwd.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 3028bc493c7f
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository lukas-grigis/ralphctl (24 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 468 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
verify compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| verifylukas-grigis/ralphctl | Skill | 24 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| atomic-debugdamusix/atomic-claude | Skill | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 114 | Claude Code, Codex |
| sipcode-regressAnuj7411/sipcode | Skill | 46 | 21d ago | MIT | A | 105 | Claude Code |
| debug-my-harnesszernie/vigiles | Skill | 15 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 114 | Claude Code |
| linter-docszernie/vigiles | Skill | 15 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 125 | Claude Code |
| system-healthrandomittin/heimdall | Skill | 5 | 16d ago | MIT | A | 102 | Claude Code |
| sonar-manage-findingsNick2bad4u/SonarCloud-Skill | Skill | 2 | 6d ago | Unlicense | A | 46 | Codex |