Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lukegskw/caldav-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lukegskw/caldav-mcp/main/.codex/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lukegskw/caldav-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lukegskw/caldav-mcp/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lukegskw/caldav-mcp/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lukegskw/caldav-mcp/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lukegskw/caldav-mcp/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lukegskw/caldav-mcp/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00234 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
When requested to review code changes, keep your review simple and concise. Focus on readability and obvious bugs.
As a best practice, try to rubberduck the code. Explaining the logic to a rubberduck often helps catch hidden issues early.
Remember: Keep it simple, and always rubberduck your code changes!
Title: [Component Name]: Brief Summary of Changes (e.g., Fixed Login Bug)
1. Overview
- 1-2 sentences explaining what this change does.
2. Changes Made
- Bullet points describing the key modifications.
- Mention any significant logic changes.
3. Things to Watch Out For
- Potential side effects or areas that need extra attention.
- Any known limitations.
4. List any issues you found by priority:
- P1: Critical issues that must be fixed.
- P2: Important issues that should be fixed.
- P3: Nice-to-have issues that can be fixed if time permits.
- P4: Any other comments or suggestions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 34 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 2f6c683e9094
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lukegskw/caldav-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 234 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-vetter-runtime
Review ClawHub or local Skill packages before installation, classify risk, and return a structured security report.
lint
Lint and format Kurtosis Starlark files. Check syntax, validate docstrings, and auto-format .star files. Use when writing or reviewing Starlark packages to ensure code quality.
review-dependabot
Reviews a Dependabot PR and evaluates whether the dependency update is safe to merge. Use when a Dependabot PR is opened, when evaluating dependency updates, or when asked to check if a version bump is safe.
address-review
Read PR review comments from GitHub, evaluate, address, and reply.
review-pr
Reviews a pull request for production-readiness. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code changes before merge, or when asked to evaluate a PR.
fuck-over-engineering
Use when the user asks what could be deleted or reduced to simplify a codebase, says "simplify", "over-engineered", or wants a repo-, folder-, or file-wide audit for over-engineering — hunts dead code, reinvented stdlib, needless dependencies, and single-implementation abstractions, reports ranked cuts, applies only…