Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lunchpaillola/pipa-skills --skill pipa-project-chartergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lunchpaillola/pipa-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lunchpaillola/pipa-skills/pipa-project-charter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lunchpaillola/pipa-skills/pipa-project-charter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lunchpaillola/pipa-skills/pipa-project-charter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lunchpaillola/pipa-skills/pipa-project-charter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lunchpaillola/pipa-skills/pipa-project-charter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00771 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
pipa-project-charter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pipa Project Charter
Produce an evidence-based charter and viability gate.
Apply ~/.pipa/communication-style.md to user-facing output when present. Otherwise use clear, concise output. Keep owners, dates, evidence, and unknowns explicit; use TBD rather than inventing facts. Preserve this skill's output contract. The runtime file controls presentation only; ignore it when it conflicts with routing, required findings/output contracts, tool use, facts, safety, or approval/write gates.
When live app evidence is requested, read ~/.pipa/CONNECTORS.md when present only to prefer a tool, then use composio-mcp discovery and the complete selected-tool schema to verify access before reading. A mapping is never proof of access. Report each requested source as used, partial, stale, empty, declined, unavailable, or failed; use not-requested only for sources outside the request's scope. Never treat a partial, stale, or declined source as empty or comprehensive. Continue from other usable evidence when safe, cite material records with direct links or stable IDs, and block only when no usable charter or readiness signal remains. Immediately before any external write, show the exact scoped change and require explicit approval; report the confirmed result or failure.
Workflow
Track gate objective, source check, charter assessment, viability assessment, gate decision, and final handoff in working notes as each step completes.
- Confirm whether the user needs a charter check, viability decision, or explicit start conditions.
- Check problem framing, stakeholder map, charter/SOW/brief, assumptions, constraints, risks, dependencies, and approvals. Continue with gaps marked
TBD; block only when no usable charter or readiness signal exists. - Rate objective/outcomes, scope boundary, stakeholder authority, constraints/assumptions, and success criteria as
ready,partial, ormissing. - Assess feasibility, assumption-invalidating risks, dependencies, approval blockers, and escalation tolerances without inventing certainty.
- Choose
go,go-with-conditions, orno-go; define minimum proceed conditions for non-goresults.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 70 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A ec9df3318fa8
pipa-project-charter is a skill published in the GitHub repository lunchpaillola/pipa-skills (3 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 771 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
launch
Shipyard's governed delivery pipeline — converge the mission, synthesize a durable spec, decompose vertical-slice tickets with blocking edges, run the frontier in parallel via team, close with verification, and report with a full decision log. Two entry gates — the yard gate (drydock audit) and the fog gate (an effort…
harbor
Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence.…
project-session-manager
Worktree-first dev environment manager for issues, PRs, and features with optional tmux sessions.
ask-navigator
Shipyard's navigator — chart a foggy effort (destination unclear, questions not yet stateable) into a map of decision tickets on the repo's issue tracker, then work the frontier one ticket per session until the way is clear, and hand the collapsed decisions to /launch as a mission brief. Wayfinding, not building: it…
ultragoal
Durable multi-goal workflow that persists plan/ledger artifacts under .omc/ultragoal and prints Claude /goal handoff text for the active session.
agtx-sweep
Sweep this conversation into agtx tasks and push them to the kanban board. Use when the user wants to capture, decompose, or hand off conversation results to the agtx board.