Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to luthersystems/elps. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luthersystems/elps/main/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luthersystems/elpsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luthersystems/elps/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luthersystems/elps/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luthersystems/elps/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luthersystems/elps/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luthersystems/elps/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01267 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00507 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/verify — CI Gate Skill
Runs the same checks as the Lint & Test job in .github/workflows/elps.yml,
in the same order. Use it before committing or creating a PR. If CI's steps
change, update this file to match — the workflow is the authority.
Trigger
Use when asked to verify changes, check CI readiness, or as a pre-commit/pre-PR gate.
Pipeline
Run in order. Stop and report on the first failure.
| # | Step | Command | CI step name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confidentiality guard | bash scripts/confidentiality-guard.sh |
Confidentiality guard |
| 2 | Go static checks | make static-checks |
golangci-lint, golangci-lint config schema |
| 3 | Tests | make test |
Tests |
| 4 | Race detector | make race |
Race detection (full) |
| 5 | Tagged tests | make test-elpscheck |
Singleton integrity (elpscheck) |
| 6 | elps's own Go analyzers | make elpsvet |
Seal contract (elpsvet) |
| 7 | Sealed-AST benchmark oracle | make bench-elpscheck-smoke |
Sealed-AST oracle over the benchmarks |
| 8 | Format | go build -o elps . && ./elps fmt -l ./... |
Check formatting |
| 9 | Lisp lint | ./elps lint --workspace=. --exclude 'grammar' --include '_examples' ./... |
Lint ELPS source |
| 10 | Docstrings | ./elps doc -m |
Check missing documentation |
| 11 | API break gate | make api-break-gate (BASE=origin/main default) |
API break gate (job api-break) |
| 12 | Work marker gate | (none: shared workflow) | quality / result (job work-markers in the shared Quality workflow) |
Notes:
- Step 2:
make static-checksrunsgolangci-lint config verify, thengolangci-lint run ./..., then a second pass under--build-tags elpscheckscoped to./lisp/...(tagged files are invisible to the first, and today they only live there). It warns when your golangci-lint differs from CI's pin; on a mismatch, trust CI — see "golangci-lint version skew" inAGENTS.mdbefore deleting any//nolint. - Step 6: two passes (untagged and
GOFLAGS=-tags=elpscheck). For interpreting a finding, use the/elpsvetskill. - Step 8:
-llists files that would change; fix with./elps fmt ./...and re-run. - Step 9: fix the diagnostic, or add
; nolint:<check-name>only for a genuine false positive. - Step 10: add the missing docstring to the builtin/op/macro/export.
- Step 11: fails when the branch removes or incompatibly changes the Go
API of a non-internal package or the Lisp public surface (packages,
exports, kind, formals) against its merge base with
BASE. If the break is intended, paste the line the gate prints intoscripts/api-breaks.txt, fill the issue (and the substrate migration) and reason, and justify it in the PR. Otherwise restore compatibility (keep the old name/arity, add instead of change). - Step 12: fails on a work marker that does not name an open issue
(
MARKER(#N)) and that.github/quality/work-markers.txtdoes not cover, and on an entry that covers nothing. Do the work, or name its issue. Delete stale entries. - CI also builds and vets on Windows (
go build ./... && go vet ./...); rungo vet ./...if you touched OS-specific code. - Touched
scripts/,cmd/benchgate,benchmark.ymlorfuzz.yml? Also runmake ci-gates-test(andmake fuzz-classify-testfor fuzz changes).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 83 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b6a717af9f67
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository luthersystems/elps (36 stars, last pushed today), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,267 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-guidelines-go
Go 1.24–1.27 coding guidelines for the dimetron/pi-go AI agent runtime. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring ANY Go code in pi-go. This covers idiomatic style, error handling, concurrency, project layout, testing (table-driven, fuzz, benchmarks, synctest), new stdlib usage, golangci-lint v2…
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…
ci-orchestrator
Run a CI-like pipeline locally (format, lint, vet, static-analysis, tests) and summarize per-step results with remediation guidance.
code-review-pi
Review code for quality, run linters, check test coverage, fix issues, and enforce gates. Save the final report to ./specs/issues/003-code-review-pi/PROMPT.md. Use before committing changes.
bmad-checkpoint-preview
LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".
go-127
What changed in Go 1.27 (released August 2026) and how it changes the way Go is written in pi-go. Use this skill when writing or reviewing Go that could use a 1.27 feature, when bumping the go directive in go.mod, when a build or test behaves differently after a toolchain upgrade, or when code-guidelines-go points…