Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LuuOW/meridian-mcp --skill contentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuuOW/meridian-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/content)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01798 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00899 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00360 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
content
Covers the full content lifecycle: strategy, briefing, production (AI-assisted and human), and distribution. Applies across blog, email, UGC, and social formats.
1) Content brief template
# Brief: [Article Title]
**Target keyword**: [primary keyword]
**Search intent**: informational | transactional | navigational | commercial
**Word count**: [target range]
**Funnel stage**: TOFU | MOFU | BOFU
## Audience
- Who: [persona]
- Pain point: [specific problem this solves]
- Prior knowledge: beginner | intermediate | expert
## Structure
- H1: [exact title]
- H2s: [list of sections]
- Featured snippet target: [≤50 word answer to lead with]
## Must-include
- [ ] Cite: [source 1], [source 2], [source 3]
- [ ] Data point: [statistic or study]
- [ ] CTA: [specific action at end]
## Tone
[brand voice adjectives — e.g., "authoritative but approachable, no jargon"]
2) Topic clustering (programmatic)
from sklearn.metrics.pairwise import cosine_similarity
import numpy as np
def cluster_topics(keywords: list[str], embeddings: np.ndarray, threshold: float = 0.82) -> list[list[str]]:
"""Group semantically similar keywords into content clusters."""
sim_matrix = cosine_similarity(embeddings)
clusters, assigned = [], set()
for i, kw in enumerate(keywords):
if i in assigned:
continue
cluster = [kw]
assigned.add(i)
for j in range(i + 1, len(keywords)):
if j not in assigned and sim_matrix[i][j] >= threshold:
cluster.append(keywords[j])
assigned.add(j)
clusters.append(cluster)
return sorted(clusters, key=len, reverse=True)
3) AI-assisted writing workflow
# Multi-pass writing: research → outline → draft → refine
async def write_article(brief: dict) -> str:
# Pass 1: Research context
research = await gather_research(brief["keyword"], brief["citations"])
# Pass 2: Outline (structure-first)
outline = await llm_call(
system="You are a senior editor. Output only a structured markdown outline.",
prompt=f"Create outline for: {brief['title']}\nResearch context:\n{research[:2000]}"
)
# Pass 3: Draft section by section (prevents context overflow)
sections = []
for section in parse_outline(outline):
draft = await llm_call(
system=brief["tone_instructions"],
prompt=f"Write section: {section}\nBrief: {brief}\nPrior sections summary: {summarise(sections)}"
)
sections.append(draft)
# Pass 4: Editorial polish
full_draft = "\n\n".join(sections)
return await llm_call(
system="Fix grammar, improve flow, ensure E-E-A-T compliance. Do not change facts.",
prompt=full_draft
)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 208 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A ad6d446f4f47
content is a skill published in the GitHub repository LuuOW/meridian-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,798 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Content Strategy
Plan content aligned with user personas and journey stages. Use when asked to "plan content," "create content strategy," "build editorial calendar," "map content to personas," "audit existing content," or when aligning marketing/docs content with user journeys defined in persona docs.
xiaohongshu-ingest
A workflow for collecting Xiaohongshu, a Chinese social-media platform, posts into structured Markdown files. It can also break down popular posts into reusable content ideas based on audience, situation, problem, emotion, and hook.
ads-creative
Creative Brief Generator for designers, video editors, and content teams.
multi-channel-publishing
Use when repurposing long-form content into channel-specific formats — LinkedIn posts, conference abstracts, podcast briefs, newsletter summaries, tweet threads, or spoken scripts. Encodes compression methodology, channel format rules, evidence density calibration, and audience adaptation. Produces channel-ready…
troitsa
A workflow that gives one task three separate roles: a planner, a worker that handles the main workload, and a critic that tries to find problems. The roles may be assigned to different AI models or acted out within one model.
slides
Use when create strategic HTML presentations with Chart.js, design tokens, responsive layouts, copywriting formulas, and contextual slide strategies.