Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LuuOW/meridian-mcp --skill reasoninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuuOW/meridian-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/reasoning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/reasoning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/luuow/meridian-mcp/reasoning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00937 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00375 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
reasoning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
reasoning
Covers how to reliably extract high-quality reasoning from LLMs: prompt design, decomposition strategies, output validation, and evaluation at scale.
1) Prompt architecture patterns
# Structure: System → Context → Task → Constraints → Output format
PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """
[SYSTEM]
You are {persona}. {core_capability_statement}.
[CONTEXT]
{relevant_background}
[TASK]
{specific_instruction_verb_first}
[CONSTRAINTS]
- {constraint_1}
- {constraint_2}
[OUTPUT FORMAT]
{exact_format_specification}
"""
# Verb-first task instructions improve instruction-following
GOOD = "Classify the following text as..."
BAD = "I would like you to think about classifying..."
2) Chain-of-thought (CoT)
# Zero-shot CoT — append "Think step by step"
def zero_shot_cot(question: str) -> str:
return f"{question}\n\nThink step by step before giving your final answer."
# Few-shot CoT — provide worked examples
FEW_SHOT_COT = """
Q: Is the keto diet safe for type 2 diabetics?
Thinking: Type 2 diabetes involves insulin resistance. Keto reduces carbs → lower blood glucose →
reduced insulin demand. Studies show HbA1c improvements. Risk: hypoglycaemia if on medication.
Answer: Generally beneficial but requires medical supervision and medication adjustment.
Q: {new_question}
Thinking:"""
# Scratchpad pattern — separate reasoning from answer
SCRATCHPAD = """
Work through this in a <scratchpad> block, then give your final answer after </scratchpad>.
{question}
"""
3) Self-consistency (ensemble reasoning)
# Generate N independent answers, take majority vote
async def self_consistent_answer(prompt: str, n: int = 5, temperature: float = 0.7) -> str:
answers = await asyncio.gather(*[
llm_call(prompt, temperature=temperature) for _ in range(n)
])
# Extract final answers and vote
finals = [extract_final_answer(a) for a in answers]
from collections import Counter
return Counter(finals).most_common(1)[0][0]
# Useful when: high-stakes classification, numeric estimation, factual Q&A
# Not useful when: creative writing, style tasks, open-ended generation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 218 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 1733b5189828
reasoning is a skill published in the GitHub repository LuuOW/meridian-mcp (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,875 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dspy-output-refinement-constraints
Use for dspy.Refine, dspy.BestOfN, output constraints, validation, reward functions, and iterative output refinement.
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
prompts
Version and manage your agent's prompts with LangWatch Prompts CLI. Use for both onboarding (set up prompt versioning for an entire codebase) and targeted operations (version a specific prompt, create a new prompt version). Supports Python and TypeScript.
llm-engineering-expert
Build reliable applications on large language models: prompt design, structured output, evaluation, guardrails, and cost and latency control. Use when the user mentions LLMs, prompts, prompt engineering, few-shot examples, structured or JSON output, function calling, hallucination, model evaluation, token costs…
ai-engineering-toolkit
AI Engineering Toolkit workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs 6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching and the operator…