Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Lykhoyda/ask-llm/plugin install ask-llmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lykhoyda/ask-llm/antigravity-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lykhoyda/ask-llm/antigravity-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lykhoyda/ask-llm/antigravity-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lykhoyda/ask-llm/antigravity-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lykhoyda/ask-llm/antigravity-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00630 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
antigravity-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Portable contract
Gather the relevant staged, unstaged, and untracked code changes; build a bounded context brief; request an Antigravity review; verify each reported finding against source; and return only prioritized, source-supported findings. Preserve read-only intent, provider authentication errors, timeout behavior, and explicit failure disclosure.
Host adapters
Pi adapter
Call the native ask-antigravity tool and apply only the Portable contract section of ../../agents/antigravity-reviewer.md; ignore that file's frontmatter and Claude Code adapter.
Claude Code adapter
The existing detailed workflow below is the Claude Code adapter. Its Agent, MCP, hook, CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT, and AskUserQuestion mechanics apply only on Claude Code; they do not override the Pi adapter above.
Antigravity Code Review
Review current code changes by delegating to the antigravity-reviewer agent — a subscription-backed second opinion via Google's Antigravity CLI (agy).
Prerequisites
This skill is experimental and requires:
agyinstalled and logged in once (runagyinteractively to complete Google Sign-In).- The Antigravity MCP server registered, e.g.
claude mcp add antigravity -- npx -y @ask-llm/antigravity-mcp.
It is one-shot (no multi-turn) and subscription-backed — it uses your Google AI Pro/Ultra plan, not per-token API billing. For routine review on a paid OpenAI/Gemini setup, prefer codex-review or gemini-review. To compare several providers at once, use multi-review.
Instructions
-
Gather the diff to review:
- Run
git diffto get unstaged changes - Run
git diff --cachedto get staged changes - Combine both into a single diff
- Run
-
If the diff is empty, inform the user there are no changes to review.
-
Launch the
antigravity-revieweragent with the diff content. The agent handles the Antigravity prompt structure, confidence filtering, and output formatting. If themcp__antigravity__ask-antigravitytool is unavailable, the agent will tell the user to register the Antigravity MCP server rather than failing silently.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 50 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A ae9860fb8eac
antigravity-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lykhoyda/ask-llm (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
verify-change
A change-checking skill that reviews code differences and checks whether related documentation, tests, and records were updated.
verify-module
A module-checking skill that scans a project’s folders, code, and documentation. It expects each module to include a README.md and DESIGN.md, which explain how the module is used and why it was designed that way.
verify-quality
A code-quality checker that measures complexity, size, naming, and common code smells. It reports problems such as duplicated code, unused code, and overly long functions.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.
agtx-review
Self-review completed work. Check for correctness, edge cases, and code quality. Write review to .agtx/review.md and stop.