Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lylo/pagecord. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lylo/pagecord/main/.agents/skills/ui-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lylo/pagecordWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lylo/pagecord/ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lylo/pagecord/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lylo/pagecord/ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lylo/pagecord/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lylo/pagecord/ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00156 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00078 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 18 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 87eba6d17363
ui-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lylo/pagecord (188 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 156 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qt-qml-review
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks.…
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
frontend-architecture
Frontend component architecture review — dispatch the component-architecture-review agent over the frontend component files to catch reusable components that should be extracted, duplicated UI patterns, prop drilling, component-granularity problems, and inconsistent component APIs as a frontend evolves. Use when the…
review-persistence-security-resources
Normative reviewer for persistence, settings, secrets, logging hygiene, resources, caches, cross-platform behavior and long-lived state in the explyt/spring-plugin IntelliJ plugin. Use when reviewing changes that touch PersistentStateComponent, settings UI, credentials, caches, service fields, logging, file paths…
vue-best-practices
A review checklist for Vue 2 and Vue 3 components, covering component names, prop declarations, TypeScript casts, API styles and complex template expressions.