Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals --skill design-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globalsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/design-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/design-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/design-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/design-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/design-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.01135 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00454 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
design-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
[SKILL] design-research
[OBJ] Ground every design decision in real shipped-product evidence via the refero and mobbin MCP servers — then hand off to design-md-lord for token application.
[TOOL-MAP] Pick the layer that answers the question:
| Need | Refero | Mobbin |
|---|---|---|
| Visual direction/taste, tokens, typography | refero_search_styles + refero_get_style |
— |
| Concrete screen/pattern/state | refero_search_screens (+get_similar_screens, get_screen_image) |
search_screens |
| Multi-step journey | refero_search_flows + refero_get_flow |
search_flows |
| Website section (hero/pricing/footer) | — | search_sections |
| iOS app screens/flows | platform=ios |
native coverage |
[RULES]
- [PROHIBIT] No design from vibe memory — every major visual, layout, content, or interaction decision MUST trace to a searched reference, the user's brief, or a craft doc. Research before implementation, always.
- [REQ] Search several angles before choosing: 3–5 queries — one broad aesthetic, one domain/category, one named strong product. Compare ≥3 real examples; never copy a single reference.
- [REQ] Pick ONE dominant direction, don't average. When references conflict, keep the primary's signature traits sharp; secondary references contribute 1–2 narrow details only. Averaged references = generic AI slop.
- [REQ] Evidence, not proof: a shipped example shows a product USED a design — it does not prove the design performs. A recurring pattern is a convention, not a best practice. Separate "observed on screen" from "recommended".
- [REQ] Preserve provenance: for every load-bearing reference record product name + canonical URL (Refero/Mobbin link). Check capture metadata when recency matters.
- [REQ] Token-meaning discipline: if a reference assigns a color/radius/shadow/role, use it only for that role — same law as
design-md-lordrule 6–7. - [REQ] Brief before searching — missing info only if it materially changes the result:
Designing [WHAT] for [WHO] on [PLATFORM]. Goal: [...]. Tone: [...]. Objection: [...]. Must remember: [HOOK]. Constraints: [...]. Research needed: [styles/screens/flows/sections]. - [REQ] Reference-lock before build: lock (a) a user-provided source, (b) an existing design-system target, or (c) an explicit reference-locked direction + decision ledger (why this reference, what we take, what we reject).
- [REQ] Validate after building: compare rendered output against the locked reference; fix design drift — research alone is not "done". Follow with
DesignSlopVerifier+ui_a11y_checker(a11y is evaluated independently — a real product's choice is not an a11y guarantee). - [PROHIBIT] No verbatim copying: no protected layouts, branding, copy text, logos, or assets — extract the structure and the why, rebuild it for THIS product.
- [REQ] Rate limits: Mobbin MCP = 60 req/60s — batch sensibly, respect
Retry-Afteron 429. Weak results → query more specifically (platform + category + pattern + goal); too narrow → drop constraints. - [REQ] MCP absent? Do NOT fake research — state it plainly and proceed with
design-md-lord's bundled catalog references + the user's own examples. Reference-lock still applies.
[WORKFLOWS]
- New page/screen: brief →
search_styles(direction) +search_screens/search_sections(composition) → compare 3+ → lock primary + ledger →design-md-lordfor token application → build → slop + a11y verify. - Flow task (onboarding/checkout/paywall/cancel):
search_flows→get_flow→ map step goals/actions/system responses → adapt to product → build → verify sequence against reference flow. - Design critique/audit: capture current state → pull comparable
search_screensevidence → report observed-vs-recommended per rule 4 → diff → fix. - Mobile:
platform=ios(Refero) or Mobbin screens → respect platform HIG conventions found in references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 57 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A d2c256735e2d
design-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,135 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
glance-canonical-layouts
Use this skill to create home screen widgets using Jetpack Glance Canonical Layouts from the Android Platform Samples project, or when asked to implement standard widget layout patterns (including Check List, Image Grid, Snap Scrolling, and Standard Toolbar).
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.