Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals --skill dispute-resolutiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globalsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/dispute-resolution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/dispute-resolution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/dispute-resolution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/dispute-resolution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/dispute-resolution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00573 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
dispute-resolution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
[SKILL] dispute-resolution [OBJ] Resolve freelance conflicts — non-payment, rejected delivery, scope fights — through evidence, platform escrow, and structured mediation, minimizing loss and reputation damage.
[RULES]
- [REQ] Prevent first: every engagement uses
contract-studio+ platform escrow/milestones so disputes have a contractual baseline. No contract = higher risk. - [REQ] Evidence discipline: keep timestamps, messages, deliverable versions, approvals. A dispute is won/lost on documented evidence, not claims.
- [CMD] Context7 IDs:
documenso/documenso(signed contract + audit trail),invoiceninja/invoiceninja(invoice/payment record),chatwoot/chatwoot(comms log). - [REQ] Escrow flow (platform): request milestone release with evidence; if client rejects, invoke platform dispute with the record. Follow Upwork/Freelancer/Mostaql process exactly.
- [REQ] Mediation ladder: (1) direct clarification, (2) offer revision within scope, (3) partial delivery/refund compromise, (4) platform/official mediation. Escalate in order.
- [REQ] Scope defense: cite the signed SOW; reject out-of-scope without a change-order (see
client-onboarding). Offer paid add-on instead. - [REQ] Arabic/RTL: Arabic-platform disputes (Mostaql/Khamsat) follow their Arabic ToS; Arabic evidence + RTL; tone per
arabic-freelance. - [REQ] Documentation: log dispute, parties, evidence, steps, outcome to memory for pattern analysis (feeds
freelance-nicherisk profile). - [REQ] Reputation protection: stay professional; never public shaming; some platforms penalize. Prefer private resolution.
- [REQ] Legal escalation: only after platform routes fail; advise user to consult a licensed attorney (no legal advice given).
[PROHIBIT]
- No forged or altered evidence.
- No off-platform "side settlement" that voids protections.
- No using client data/hostage as leverage.
- No dispute handled without the signed contract on file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A e8b7cfac93c1
dispute-resolution is a skill published in the GitHub repository m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 573 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…