Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals --skill durable-execution-lordgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globalsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/durable-execution-lord)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/durable-execution-lord"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/durable-execution-lord/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/durable-execution-lord"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals/durable-execution-lord.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01282 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00641 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00256 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
durable-execution-lord scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Durable Execution Lord
[OBJ] Design agent workflows that survive crashes, restarts, and partial failures using durable execution frameworks with replay, idempotency, and compensation.
Problem
Agent workflows span multiple steps, external API calls, human approvals, and long waits. A crash mid-workflow leaves the system in an inconsistent state — half-sent emails, partial database writes, orphaned resources. Traditional try/catch cannot recover a process that died. Durable execution frameworks persist workflow state so any process can resume from the last completed step after a restart.
Rules
- [REQ] When to use durable execution. Use a durable framework when the workflow is: long-running (>30s), multi-step with external side effects, human-in-the-loop (waits hours/days), or requires guaranteed completion. Short stateless requests do not need it.
- [REQ] Temporal patterns. Use Temporal for complex enterprise workflows. Workflow-as-code (not DSL), durable timers (
workflow.sleep), automatic retries with backoff, signals (external input mid-workflow), queries (read workflow state without affecting it). Workflows are deterministic — no random, noDate.now()inside workflow code. - [REQ] Inngest patterns. Use Inngest for serverless event-driven workflows.
step.runfor durable steps,step.sleepfor timed delays,step.waitForEventfor external triggers. Fan-out via batch events. No long-lived servers needed — runs on serverless functions. - [REQ] DBOS patterns. Use DBOS for Python-native workflows with transactional guarantees. Steps are database-backed; checkpoints are DB rows.
@DBOS.stepdecorators,DBOS.sleep,DBOS.recv. Ideal for data-intensive Python pipelines. - [REQ] Prefect patterns. Use Prefect for data pipelines and ETL.
@flowand@taskdecorators,flow.runfor orchestration, native Dask/Spark integration. Good for batch data processing with retry and caching. - [REQ] Restate patterns. Use Restate for durable services and virtual objects. Virtual objects = keyed actors with durable state.
asynchandlers, durable timers, exactly-once invocation. Ideal for stateful agent services. - [REQ] Idempotency. Every step MUST be idempotent — safe to execute multiple times with the same result. Use idempotency keys (request ID, event ID) at external API boundaries. The framework retries; idempotency prevents duplicate side effects.
- [REQ] Checkpoint and replay. The framework MUST checkpoint after each step. On crash, replay from last checkpoint — re-execute only incomplete steps. Never replay completed steps with side effects (idempotency covers this, but checkpoints prevent unnecessary calls).
- [REQ] Error handling. Distinguish retryable errors (network, 5xx, timeout) from non-retryable (validation, 4xx, auth). Retryable = framework retries with backoff. Non-retryable = fail the step, trigger compensation or human escalation.
- [REQ] Timeout and saga patterns. Every step has a timeout. Long workflows use the saga pattern: each step has a compensating action (undo). On failure, execute compensations in reverse order. No step without a defined compensation for side-effecting operations.
- [REQ] Compensation. Compensations MUST be idempotent and best-effort. If compensation fails, log + escalate to human. Do not infinite-loop on compensation failure. Document what "compensated" means per step (email sent → send retraction, DB write → delete row).
- [REQ] Observability. Every workflow run MUST be traceable: workflow ID, run ID, step history, current status, duration per step. Use the framework's built-in UI (Temporal Web, Inngest Dashboard, Prefect UI) + export metrics to Prometheus/Datadog.
- [REQ] Testing durable workflows. Test workflows by: (a) unit testing individual steps, (b) simulating crashes by killing the worker mid-run and verifying resume, (c) testing compensation by injecting failures at each step. No workflow ships without a crash-resume test.
- [REQ] Cost considerations. Durable frameworks have costs: Temporal (hosting or self-host infra), Inngest (per-invocation), DBOS (DB storage), Prefect (cloud or self-host), Restate (self-host). Estimate cost per workflow run × expected volume before choosing.
- [REQ] Framework selection matrix. Temporal: enterprise, complex, multi-language. Inngest: serverless, event-driven, JS/TS. DBOS: Python, transactional, data-heavy. Prefect: data pipelines, Python, batch. Restate: stateful services, virtual objects, low-latency. Match framework to workload, not hype.
- [PROHIBIT] Using raw
async/awaitwith manual state persistence for workflows that have external side effects and must guarantee completion — this is not durable, it is wishful thinking.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 58 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A f39854306f24
durable-execution-lord is a skill published in the GitHub repository m3taz-ahmed/ai-globals (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,282 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
mem0-oss-to-platform
Plan and then execute a migration of a project from the mem0 open-source / self-hosted SDK (the local Memory class) to the mem0 Platform / hosted / managed SDK (the MemoryClient class). Use this whenever a developer wants to move, switch, or migrate their mem0 usage off OSS/self-hosted to the hosted API — e.g.…
agui-dotnet-protobuf
Use the protobuf wire transport (instead of the default Server-Sent Events) for an AG-UI connection with the AG-UI .NET SDK — a compact binary event stream negotiated via the Accept header. USE FOR: making an AGUIChatClient prefer protobuf by wiring an AGUIEventStreamHandler with ProtobufEventStreamFormatter (then…
azure-mgmt-botservice-dotnet
Azure Resource Manager SDK for Bot Service in .NET. Management plane operations for creating and managing Azure Bot resources, channels (Teams, DirectLine, Slack), and connection settings. Triggers: "Bot Service", "BotResource", "Azure Bot", "DirectLine channel", "Teams channel", "bot management .NET", "create bot".
fastapi-router-py
Create FastAPI routers with CRUD operations, authentication dependencies, and proper response models. Use when building REST API endpoints, creating new routes, implementing CRUD operations, or adding authenticated endpoints in FastAPI applications.
aws-sdk-java-v2-core
Provides AWS SDK for Java 2.x client configuration, credential resolution, HTTP client tuning, timeout, retry, and testing patterns. Use when creating or hardening AWS service clients, wiring Spring Boot beans, debugging auth or region issues, or choosing sync vs async SDK usage.
migrate-segw-to-rap
Reverse-engineer a SEGW-built OData V2 service (MPC/DPC/MPCEXT/DPCEXT) into a modern RAP V4 service — tables, CDS views (interface + projection), behavior definitions, draft entities, service definition + binding. Use when asked to "migrate this SEGW service to RAP", "convert OData V2 to V4 RAP", "modernize this…