code-quality

Guidance for reviewing and refactoring code so it stays clear, maintainable, testable, and organized around focused responsibilities.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for code reviews, refactoring, reducing complexity, applying design principles such as SOLID, and improving testability.
Why use it?
It helps reveal overly complex code, classes that do too much, repeated logic, and structures that make future changes or testing difficult.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/macromania/agentop/code-quality
Any agent
npx skills add macromania/agentop --skill code-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/macromania/agentop

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 68 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,466 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00068 $0.02466
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.01233
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00493
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00247

Measured 2d ago against content hash 781f40277c42, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md · 392 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 392 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality & Refactoring

Best practices for writing clean, maintainable, and high-quality code based on proven patterns from Vercel, Anthropic, and industry standards.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing code for quality issues
  • Refactoring existing code
  • Reducing complexity
  • Improving testability
  • Applying design patterns
  • Code review feedback

Code Quality Principles

SOLID Principles

// ❌ BAD: Class doing too much (violates SRP)
class TaskManager {
  createTask(title: string) { /* ... */ }
  updateTask(id: string, data: Partial<Task>) { /* ... */ }
  deleteTask(id: string) { /* ... */ }
  sendTaskNotification(taskId: string) { /* ... */ }
  generateTaskReport(taskId: string) { /* ... */ }
  syncTaskToExternalService(taskId: string) { /* ... */ }
}

// ✅ GOOD: Single Responsibility Principle
class TaskRepository {
  create(title: string): Task { /* ... */ }
  update(id: string, data: Partial<Task>): Task { /* ... */ }
  delete(id: string): void { /* ... */ }
}

class TaskNotificationService {
  notify(taskId: string): void { /* ... */ }
}

class TaskReportGenerator {
  generate(taskId: string): Report { /* ... */ }
}

Open/Closed Principle

// ❌ BAD: Must modify class to add new behavior
class AttentionHandler {
  handle(type: AttentionType, step: AgentStep) {
    if (type === 'supervised') {
      // supervised logic
    } else if (type === 'delegated') {
      // delegated logic
    } else if (type === 'sensitive') {
      // sensitive logic
    }
    // Adding new type requires modifying this class
  }
}

// ✅ GOOD: Open for extension, closed for modification
interface AttentionStrategy {
  handle(step: AgentStep): Promise<boolean>;
}

class SupervisedStrategy implements AttentionStrategy {
  async handle(step: AgentStep): Promise<boolean> {
    // Always require approval
    return await requestUserApproval(step);
  }
}

class DelegatedStrategy implements AttentionStrategy {
  async handle(step: AgentStep): Promise<boolean> {
    // Auto-approve
    return true;
  }
}

class SensitiveStrategy implements AttentionStrategy {
  private sensitiveTools = ['run_command', 'delete_file'];
  
  async handle(step: AgentStep): Promise<boolean> {
    if (this.sensitiveTools.includes(step.toolCall?.name ?? '')) {
      return await requestUserApproval(step);
    }
    return true;
  }
}

// New attention types just add new strategy classes

Read the full file on GitHub · 392 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 392 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 781f40277c42

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository macromania/agentop (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,466 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.