Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/madappgang/claude-code/new-tracknpx skills add MadAppGang/claude-code --skill new-trackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadAppGang/claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/madappgang/claude-code/new-track)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/madappgang/claude-code/new-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/madappgang/claude-code/new-track.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.02013 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01007 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00403 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
new-track scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 260 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
plugin: conductor updated: 2026-01-20
<conductor_required>
FIRST check if conductor/ directory exists with required files.
If not, HALT and guide user to run conductor:setup first.
</conductor_required>
<context_awareness>
ALWAYS read these files before planning:
- conductor/product.md (understand project goals)
- conductor/tech-stack.md (know technical constraints)
- conductor/workflow.md (follow team processes)
</context_awareness>
<track_id_format>
Format: {shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}
Examples:
- feature_auth_20260105
- bugfix_login_20260105
- refactor_api_20260105
</track_id_format>
</critical_constraints>
<core_principles> Always create spec.md BEFORE plan.md. Spec defines WHAT, Plan defines HOW.
<principle name="Hierarchical Plans" priority="critical">
Plans must have:
- 2-6 Phases (major milestones)
- 2-5 Tasks per phase
- 0-3 Subtasks per task (optional)
</principle>
<principle name="Actionable Tasks" priority="high">
Each task must be:
- Specific (clear outcome)
- Estimable (roughly 1-4 hours)
- Independent (minimal dependencies)
</principle>
</core_principles>
<phase number="2" name="Context Loading">
<step>Read conductor/product.md</step>
<step>Read conductor/tech-stack.md</step>
<step>Read conductor/tracks.md for existing tracks</step>
</phase>
<phase number="3" name="Track Type">
<step>Ask: What type of work? [Feature, Bugfix, Refactor, Task, Other]</step>
<step>Ask: Short name for this track? (3-10 chars, lowercase)</step>
<step>Generate track ID: {type}_{shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}</step>
</phase>
<phase number="4" name="Spec Generation">
<step>Ask: What is the goal of this work? (1-2 sentences)</step>
<step>Ask: What are the acceptance criteria? (list 3-5)</step>
<step>Ask: Any technical constraints or dependencies?</step>
<step>Ask: Any edge cases or error scenarios to handle?</step>
<step>Generate conductor/tracks/{track_id}/spec.md</step>
</phase>
<phase number="5" name="Plan Generation">
<step>Based on spec, propose 2-6 phases</step>
<step>Ask user to confirm or modify phases</step>
<step>For each phase, generate 2-5 tasks</step>
<step>Add subtasks where complexity warrants</step>
<step>Generate conductor/tracks/{track_id}/plan.md</step>
</phase>
<phase number="6" name="Finalization">
<step>Create conductor/tracks/{track_id}/metadata.json</step>
<step>Update conductor/tracks.md with new track</step>
<step>Present summary to user</step>
</phase>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 260 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 8b55d3142db1
new-track is a skill published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/claude-code (279 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 2,013 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
plan
Research codebase and create spec + phased implementation plan with file-level tasks.
backlog
Manage the backlog — plan, track, navigate phases and epics. Use when planning phases, viewing roadmaps, or restructuring work.
orchestrate
Multi-agent workflow orchestration with predefined templates and agent handoff protocol.
add-community-extension
Add a community extension to the Spec Kit catalog from a GitHub issue submission. USE FOR: processing extension submission issues, validating catalog entries, updating catalog.community.json and docs/community/extensions.md, creating PRs. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new extensions from scratch, or first-party extension…
openspec-explore
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
release-openspec
Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is…