Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add magnus919/agent-skills --skill dspygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/dspy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/dspy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/dspy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/dspy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/magnus919/agent-skills/dspy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01873 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00749 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00375 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
dspy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DSPy Expert Skill
DSPy is a compiler for prompt programs, not a chain or RAG framework. You write Python programs with typed signatures and DSPy optimizes the prompts automatically.
⚠️ DSPy is NOT a chain framework. It does not use
prompt | model | parser. It does not have LCEL. DSPy operates at a different layer: you define a program with Python control flow and typed signatures, then the compiler optimizes the prompts against a metric. If you reach for DSPy expecting LangChain-style composition, you are reaching for the wrong tool.
Think of it as PyTorch for LMs — you define the architecture, the compiler tunes the weights (prompts).
Core Paradigm
Read this first. It is the most important thing to understand about DSPy.
import dspy
# 1. Configure the LM
lm = dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini")
dspy.configure(lm=lm)
# 2. Define a signature (input/output schema)
class QASignature(dspy.Signature):
"""Answer questions concisely."""
question: str = dspy.InputField()
answer: str = dspy.OutputField()
# 3. Build a program using modules
qa = dspy.ChainOfThought(QASignature)
# 4. Compile against a metric
optimizer = dspy.MIPROv2(metric=dspy.answer_exact_match)
compiled_qa = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset, num_trials=25)
# 5. Use the compiled program (portable artifact)
answer = compiled_qa(question="What is DSPy?").answer
Core Principles
-
DSPy is a compiler, not a chain framework. You define the program structure with Python control flow and typed signatures. The compiler optimizes the prompts. This is fundamentally different from LangChain's explicit prompt composition.
-
Signatures define the task. Input/output field pairs with optional descriptions are the task definition. The syntax is
input1, input2 -> output1, output2. -
Modules are program components.
dspy.Predict(direct),dspy.ChainOfThought(reasoning),dspy.ReAct(tool-use), and customdspy.Modulesubclasses. Compose them with Python control flow (if/for/while).
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/evals.json 2.7 KB
- README.md 1.7 KB
- references/agent-patterns.md 1.2 KB
- references/compilation-guide.md 2.0 KB
- references/core-modules.md 2.3 KB
- references/evaluation.md 1.8 KB
- references/example-rag-compilation.md 2.3 KB
- references/faq-and-troubleshooting.md 2.2 KB
- references/optimizer-guide.md 4.9 KB
- references/program-patterns.md 2.5 KB
- references/validation-audit.md 1.4 KB
- scripts/check-setup.py 687 B runs code
- templates/classification.py 1.1 KB runs code
- templates/multi-step.py 937 B runs code
- templates/rag-program.py 918 B runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +12 tokens per session 3ee9a82a13ff
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A c22f801e7f71
dspy is a skill published in the GitHub repository magnus919/agent-skills (151 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,873 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-engineering
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability in production. Use when optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, designing production prompt templates, or building AI-powered features.
outlines
Outlines: structured JSON/regex/Pydantic LLM generation.
instructor
Structured LLM outputs validated with Pydantic.
guidance
Constrain LLM output with grammars; guarantee valid JSON.
dspy
DSPy: declarative LM programs, auto-optimize prompts, RAG.
ai-engineering-toolkit
Overview of six AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.