Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mahmoud20138/Tradecraft --skill ai-signal-aggregatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mahmoud20138/TradecraftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mahmoud20138/tradecraft/ai-signal-aggregator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mahmoud20138/tradecraft/ai-signal-aggregator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mahmoud20138/tradecraft/ai-signal-aggregator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mahmoud20138/tradecraft/ai-signal-aggregator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mahmoud20138/tradecraft/ai-signal-aggregator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.01534 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00767 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
ai-signal-aggregator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Signal Aggregator — Meta-Strategy Signal Combiner
import pandas as pd, numpy as np
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier, GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.calibration import CalibratedClassifierCV
class AISignalAggregator:
@staticmethod
def weighted_vote(signals: dict, weights: dict = None) -> dict:
"""Combine signals from multiple strategies using weighted voting."""
default_weights = {
"trend_following": 1.2, "mean_reversion": 0.8, "breakout": 1.0,
"price_action": 1.3, "divergence": 0.9, "momentum": 0.8,
"institutional": 1.5, "news": 0.7, "sentiment_contrarian": 0.6,
"fibonacci": 0.7, "harmonic": 0.6, "elliott_wave": 0.5,
"wyckoff": 1.2, "supply_demand": 1.1, "volume_profile": 1.0,
"market_structure": 1.3, "session_breakout": 0.9, "mtf_confluence": 1.4,
}
weights = weights or default_weights
total_score = 0
total_weight = 0
details = []
for strategy, signal in signals.items():
w = weights.get(strategy, 1.0)
# Normalize signal to -1 (sell) to +1 (buy)
if isinstance(signal, str):
s = signal.upper()
score = 1.0 if "BUY" in s or "BULL" in s or "LONG" in s else -1.0 if "SELL" in s or "BEAR" in s or "SHORT" in s else 0
elif isinstance(signal, (int, float)):
score = np.clip(signal, -1, 1)
elif isinstance(signal, dict):
score = signal.get("score", signal.get("signal_score", 0))
else:
continue
total_score += score * w
total_weight += abs(w)
details.append({"strategy": strategy, "signal_score": round(score, 2), "weight": w, "contribution": round(score * w, 3)})
normalized = total_score / max(total_weight, 1e-10)
agreement = sum(1 for d in details if np.sign(d["signal_score"]) == np.sign(normalized)) / max(len(details), 1)
return {
"composite_score": round(normalized, 4),
"direction": "STRONG BUY" if normalized > 0.5 else "BUY" if normalized > 0.2 else "STRONG SELL" if normalized < -0.5 else "SELL" if normalized < -0.2 else "NEUTRAL",
"confidence": round(min(abs(normalized) * agreement * 1.5, 0.95), 3),
"agreement_pct": round(agreement * 100, 1),
"n_strategies": len(details),
"bullish_count": sum(1 for d in details if d["signal_score"] > 0),
"bearish_count": sum(1 for d in details if d["signal_score"] < 0),
"neutral_count": sum(1 for d in details if d["signal_score"] == 0),
"top_contributors": sorted(details, key=lambda d: abs(d["contribution"]), reverse=True)[:5],
"conflicts": [d["strategy"] for d in details if np.sign(d["signal_score"]) != np.sign(normalized) and d["signal_score"] != 0],
"trade_decision": AISignalAggregator._make_decision(normalized, agreement, len(details)),
}
@staticmethod
def _make_decision(score: float, agreement: float, n_strategies: int) -> str:
if n_strategies < 3:
return "INSUFFICIENT DATA — need at least 3 strategy signals"
if abs(score) > 0.4 and agreement > 0.7:
return f"HIGH CONVICTION {'BUY' if score > 0 else 'SELL'} — full position size"
if abs(score) > 0.25 and agreement > 0.5:
return f"MODERATE {'BUY' if score > 0 else 'SELL'} — reduced position size"
if abs(score) > 0.15:
return f"LOW CONVICTION {'BUY' if score > 0 else 'SELL'} — test position only"
return "NO TRADE — insufficient consensus across strategies"
@staticmethod
def train_meta_model(historical_signals: pd.DataFrame, outcomes: pd.Series) -> dict:
"""Train an ML meta-model to learn optimal signal weights from history."""
X = historical_signals.dropna()
y = (outcomes.reindex(X.index) > 0).astype(int)
common = X.index.intersection(y.index)
X, y = X.loc[common], y.loc[common]
# Time-series split
split = int(len(X) * 0.7)
X_train, X_test = X.iloc[:split], X.iloc[split:]
y_train, y_test = y.iloc[:split], y.iloc[split:]
model = CalibratedClassifierCV(GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators=100, max_depth=3), cv=3)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
accuracy = model.score(X_test, y_test)
# Extract learned weights (feature importance)
base_model = model.calibrated_classifiers_[0].estimator
importances = dict(zip(X.columns, base_model.feature_importances_))
top = sorted(importances.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
return {
"oos_accuracy": round(accuracy, 4),
"learned_weights": {k: round(v, 4) for k, v in top[:10]},
"most_predictive": top[0][0],
"least_predictive": top[-1][0],
"WARNING": "Meta-model overfits easily. Re-train monthly with walk-forward.",
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 119 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 25fab931862c
ai-signal-aggregator is a skill published in the GitHub repository mahmoud20138/Tradecraft (15 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 1,534 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
lonestaroracle-data
Live pay-per-call data for crypto and DeFi protocol risk, funding rates, open interest, liquidations, stablecoin health, macro, equities, and on-chain intelligence — settled per query in USDC on Base via x402, no signup or API key.
etf-premium
Calculate ETF premium/discount vs NAV via Yahoo Finance, and decompose single-day surges into NAV-driven vs structural components (gamma squeeze, dealer hedging, blocked AP arbitrage). Use whenever the user asks about an ETF's premium or discount, NAV comparison, why an ETF diverged from its holdings, or how much of a…
stock-liquidity
Analyze stock liquidity using bid-ask spreads, volume profiles, order book depth, market impact estimates, and turnover ratios via Yahoo Finance data. Use this skill whenever the user asks about liquidity, trading costs, bid-ask spread, market depth, volume analysis, slippage, market impact, turnover ratio, or how…
tradingview-reader
Read TradingView desktop app for market data, news, alerts, watchlists, and screener results using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants quotes, options chains, options expiries, screener results across stocks/crypto/forex/futures/bonds, gainers/losers/movers, news headlines or full story bodies…
company-valuation
Estimate the intrinsic value of a public company using DCF, relative (peer multiple) and sum-of-parts (SOTP) methods, then triangulate to an implied share price with upside/downside versus the current market price. Use this skill whenever the user asks: "what is AAPL worth", "valuation of NVDA", "fair value of TSLA"…
sepa-strategy
Analyze stocks using Mark Minervini's SEPA (Specific Entry Point Analysis) methodology. Use this skill whenever the user mentions SEPA, Minervini, superperformance, trend template, VCP (Volatility Contraction Pattern), Stage 2 uptrend, stage analysis, pivot point breakout, or asks about growth stock screening…