Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill benchmarkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/benchmark)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/benchmark.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00626 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to benchmark — 26 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Benchmark — Performance Baseline & Regression Detection
When to Use
- Before and after a PR to measure performance impact
- Setting up performance baselines for a project
- When users report "it feels slow"
- Before a launch — ensure you meet performance targets
- Comparing your stack against alternatives
How It Works
Mode 1: Page Performance
Measures real browser metrics via browser MCP:
1. Navigate to each target URL
2. Measure Core Web Vitals:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) — target < 2.5s
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) — target < 0.1
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) — target < 200ms
- FCP (First Contentful Paint) — target < 1.8s
- TTFB (Time to First Byte) — target < 800ms
3. Measure resource sizes:
- Total page weight (target < 1MB)
- JS bundle size (target < 200KB gzipped)
- CSS size
- Image weight
- Third-party script weight
4. Count network requests
5. Check for render-blocking resources
Mode 2: API Performance
Benchmarks API endpoints:
1. Hit each endpoint 100 times
2. Measure: p50, p95, p99 latency
3. Track: response size, status codes
4. Test under load: 10 concurrent requests
5. Compare against SLA targets
Mode 3: Build Performance
Measures development feedback loop:
1. Cold build time
2. Hot reload time (HMR)
3. Test suite duration
4. TypeScript check time
5. Lint time
6. Docker build time
Mode 4: Before/After Comparison
Run before and after a change to measure impact:
/benchmark baseline # saves current metrics
# ... make changes ...
/benchmark compare # compares against baseline
Output:
| Metric | Before | After | Delta | Verdict |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|---------|
| LCP | 1.2s | 1.4s | +200ms | WARNING: WARN |
| Bundle | 180KB | 175KB | -5KB | ✓ BETTER |
| Build | 12s | 14s | +2s | WARNING: WARN |
Output
Stores baselines in .ecc/benchmarks/ as JSON. Git-tracked so the team shares baselines.
Integration
- CI: run
/benchmark compareon every PR - Pair with
/canary-watchfor post-deploy monitoring - Pair with
/browser-qafor full pre-ship checklist
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 94 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 879f43d7fade
benchmark is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 626 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to benchmark, differing in 26 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sequence-diagram
Show interactions and flows over time. Illustrate request paths, asynchronous patterns, error handling. Use when documenting complex flows or onboarding on system behavior.
architecture-anti-patterns
Identify and avoid common architectural mistakes. Recognize patterns of failure. Use when reviewing designs or learning from mistakes.
architecture-patterns-catalog
Reference catalog of proven architecture patterns. Know when to apply each pattern, tradeoffs, and examples. Use as reference when designing systems.
architecture-review-facilitation
Lead effective architecture reviews. Manage discussions, surface disagreements, build consensus, document decisions. Use when conducting reviews or running architecture forums.
interview-prep
Prepare for architecture interview questions and scenarios. Practice system design, tradeoff discussions, communication. Use for career development and interview readiness.
system-audit
Conduct comprehensive system architecture evaluation. Assess design quality, technical debt, operational readiness, scalability. Use when auditing existing systems.