Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill cmd_build_fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_build_fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_build_fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_build_fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_build_fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/cmd_build_fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00675 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
cmd_build_fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Path
The first argument is the project path. Before doing anything else:
- Extract the project path from the first argument
- Verify the path exists
- Work within that directory for all file operations and shell commands
Build and Fix
Incrementally fix build and type errors with minimal, safe changes.
Step 1: Detect Build System
Identify the project's build tool and run the build:
| Indicator | Build Command |
|---|---|
package.json with build script |
npm run build or pnpm build |
tsconfig.json (TypeScript only) |
npx tsc --noEmit |
Cargo.toml |
cargo build 2>&1 |
pom.xml |
mvn compile |
build.gradle |
./gradlew compileJava |
go.mod |
go build ./... |
pyproject.toml |
python -m compileall -q . or mypy . |
Step 2: Parse and Group Errors
- Run the build command and capture stderr
- Group errors by file path
- Sort by dependency order (fix imports/types before logic errors)
- Count total errors for progress tracking
Step 3: Fix Loop (One Error at a Time)
For each error:
- Read the file — Use Read tool to see error context (10 lines around the error)
- Diagnose — Identify root cause (missing import, wrong type, syntax error)
- Fix minimally — Use Edit tool for the smallest change that resolves the error
- Re-run build — Verify the error is gone and no new errors introduced
- Move to next — Continue with remaining errors
Step 4: Guardrails
Stop and ask the user if:
- A fix introduces more errors than it resolves
- The same error persists after 3 attempts (likely a deeper issue)
- The fix requires architectural changes (not just a build fix)
- Build errors stem from missing dependencies (need
npm install,cargo add, etc.)
Step 5: Summary
Show results:
- Errors fixed (with file paths)
- Errors remaining (if any)
- New errors introduced (should be zero)
- Suggested next steps for unresolved issues
Recovery Strategies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 79 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A cb23515891eb
cmd_build_fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 675 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
system-audit
Conduct comprehensive system architecture evaluation. Assess design quality, technical debt, operational readiness, scalability. Use when auditing existing systems.
tech-debt-assessment
Measure, prioritize, and address technical debt. Classify debt by impact and effort. Build paydown roadmap. Use when evaluating system health or planning refactoring.
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. 4-phase root cause investigation — NO fixes without understanding the problem first.
sentry
Sentry error tracking and debugging specialist.
shell-scripting
Shell scripting expert for Bash, POSIX compliance, error handling, and automation.
audit
Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use when the user asks to "audit the project", "run a full audit", "project health check", "audit my code", "codebase audit", or "comprehensive review".