Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.03883 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01553 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00777 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to git-workflow — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 716 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow Patterns
Best practices for Git version control, branching strategies, and collaborative development.
When to Activate
- Setting up Git workflow for a new project
- Deciding on branching strategy (GitFlow, trunk-based, GitHub flow)
- Writing commit messages and PR descriptions
- Resolving merge conflicts
- Managing releases and version tags
- Onboarding new team members to Git practices
Branching Strategies
GitHub Flow (Simple, Recommended for Most)
Best for continuous deployment and small-to-medium teams.
main (protected, always deployable)
│
├── feature/user-auth → PR → merge to main
├── feature/payment-flow → PR → merge to main
└── fix/login-bug → PR → merge to main
Rules:
mainis always deployable- Create feature branches from
main - Open Pull Request when ready for review
- After approval and CI passes, merge to
main - Deploy immediately after merge
Trunk-Based Development (High-Velocity Teams)
Best for teams with strong CI/CD and feature flags.
main (trunk)
│
├── short-lived feature (1-2 days max)
├── short-lived feature
└── short-lived feature
Rules:
- Everyone commits to
mainor very short-lived branches - Feature flags hide incomplete work
- CI must pass before merge
- Deploy multiple times per day
GitFlow (Complex, Release-Cycle Driven)
Best for scheduled releases and enterprise projects.
main (production releases)
│
└── develop (integration branch)
│
├── feature/user-auth
├── feature/payment
│
├── release/1.0.0 → merge to main and develop
│
└── hotfix/critical → merge to main and develop
Rules:
maincontains production-ready code onlydevelopis the integration branch- Feature branches from
develop, merge back todevelop - Release branches from
develop, merge tomainanddevelop - Hotfix branches from
main, merge to bothmainanddevelop
When to Use Which
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 716 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A a67d04fc9f1d
git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 3,883 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to git-workflow, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
changelog-automation
Automate changelog generation from commits, PRs, and releases following Keep a Changelog format. Use when setting up release workflows, generating release notes, or standardizing commit conventions.
app-store-changelog
Create user-facing App Store release notes by collecting and summarizing all user-impacting changes since the last git tag (or a specified ref). Use when asked to generate a comprehensive release changelog, App Store "What's New" text, or release notes based on git history or tags.
git-workflow-and-versioning
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, splitting uncommitted work in a messy working tree into clean atomic commits, opening or reviewing a pull request (PR), pushing to a remote, or when you need to organize work across multiple…
comet-safe-delivery
A Chinese-language procedure for safely delivering specified Comet changes through Git. It covers checking worktrees and unrelated edits, staging exact files, validating hooks, and authorized commits or pushes.
studio-source-control
Drive a scoped application's linked git repository from the instance — what has to be true before Source Control works at all, the commit-then-push order, stashes and branches over /api/snsourcecontrol, and when this replaces update sets rather than sitting next to them.
git
Run git version control commands for repository management. Use when the user asks to check status, view history or diffs, stage and commit changes, manage branches, merge or rebase, work with remotes, stash changes, tag releases, cherry-pick commits, bisect regressions, resolve conflicts, manage worktrees or…