Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill opensource-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/opensource-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/opensource-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/opensource-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/opensource-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/opensource-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01707 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00683 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00341 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
opensource-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to opensource-pipeline — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Open-Source Pipeline Skill
Safely open-source any project through a 3-stage pipeline: Fork (strip secrets) → Sanitize (verify clean) → Package (CLAUDE.md + setup.sh + README).
When to Activate
- User says "open source this project" or "make this public"
- User wants to prepare a private repo for public release
- User needs to strip secrets before pushing to GitHub
- User invokes
/opensource fork,/opensource verify, or/opensource package
Commands
| Command | Action |
|---|---|
/opensource fork PROJECT |
Full pipeline: fork + sanitize + package |
/opensource verify PROJECT |
Run sanitizer on existing repo |
/opensource package PROJECT |
Generate CLAUDE.md + setup.sh + README |
/opensource list |
Show all staged projects |
/opensource status PROJECT |
Show reports for a staged project |
Protocol
/opensource fork PROJECT
Full pipeline — the main workflow.
Step 1: Gather Parameters
Resolve the project path. If PROJECT contains /, treat as a path (absolute or relative). Otherwise check: current working directory, $HOME/PROJECT, then ask the user.
SOURCE_PATH="<resolved absolute path>"
STAGING_PATH="$HOME/opensource-staging/${PROJECT_NAME}"
Ask the user:
- "Which project?" (if not found)
- "License? (MIT / Apache-2.0 / GPL-3.0 / BSD-3-Clause)"
- "GitHub org or username?" (default: detect via
gh api user -q .login) - "GitHub repo name?" (default: project name)
- "Description for README?" (analyze project for suggestion)
Step 2: Create Staging Directory
mkdir -p $HOME/opensource-staging/
Step 3: Run Forker Agent
Spawn the opensource-forker agent:
Agent(
description="Fork {PROJECT} for open-source",
subagent_type="opensource-forker",
prompt="""
Fork project for open-source release.
Source: {SOURCE_PATH}
Target: {STAGING_PATH}
License: {chosen_license}
Follow the full forking protocol:
1. Copy files (exclude .git, node_modules, __pycache__, .venv)
2. Strip all secrets and credentials
3. Replace internal references with placeholders
4. Generate .env.example
5. Clean git history
6. Generate FORK_REPORT.md in {STAGING_PATH}/FORK_REPORT.md
"""
)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 256 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A c29b1a730280
opensource-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,707 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to opensource-pipeline, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
zb-release-pipeline
Generate a GitHub Actions pipeline that builds a zb (Zero Dependencies Builder) project and publishes a GitHub Release with the produced JAR. Use whenever the user wants CI/CD, a build pipeline, a release workflow, or GitHub Actions for a zb-based Java project — phrases like "set up GitHub Actions for this zb…
npm-publish
Prepare an npm package for publishing. Handles version bump, CHANGELOG update, typings check, test run, README refresh, package.json audit, and npm pack verification. Use when the user asks to prepare a release, bump version, publish a package, or do release prep.
openclaw-release-maintainer
Maintainer workflow for OpenClaw releases, prereleases, changelog release notes, and publish validation. Use when Codex needs to prepare or verify stable or beta release steps, align version naming, assemble release notes, check release auth requirements, or validate publish-time commands and artifacts.
github-operations
Class-level workflow for GitHub repository, issue, pull request, CI, release, authentication, and remote/credential recovery tasks via gh and git. Use when asked to manage GitHub issues/PRs/runs/repos, inspect CI, call gh api, fix broken gh login, recover HTTPS/SSH credential failures, or repair git remotes.
changelog-automation
Automate changelog generation from commits, PRs, and releases following Keep a Changelog format. Use when setting up release workflows, generating release notes, or standardizing commit conventions.
github-repo-management
Clone/create/fork repos; manage remotes, releases.