Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill ralphinho-rfc-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/ralphinho-rfc-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/ralphinho-rfc-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/ralphinho-rfc-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/ralphinho-rfc-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/ralphinho-rfc-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00343 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
ralphinho-rfc-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to ralphinho-rfc-pipeline — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Ralphinho RFC Pipeline
Inspired by humanplane style RFC decomposition patterns and multi-unit orchestration workflows.
Use this skill when a feature is too large for a single agent pass and must be split into independently verifiable work units.
Pipeline Stages
- RFC intake
- DAG decomposition
- Unit assignment
- Unit implementation
- Unit validation
- Merge queue and integration
- Final system verification
Unit Spec Template
Each work unit should include:
iddepends_onscopeacceptance_testsrisk_levelrollback_plan
Complexity Tiers
- Tier 1: isolated file edits, deterministic tests
- Tier 2: multi-file behavior changes, moderate integration risk
- Tier 3: schema/auth/perf/security changes
Quality Pipeline per Unit
- research
- implementation plan
- implementation
- tests
- review
- merge-ready report
Merge Queue Rules
- Never merge a unit with unresolved dependency failures.
- Always rebase unit branches on latest integration branch.
- Re-run integration tests after each queued merge.
Recovery
If a unit stalls:
- evict from active queue
- snapshot findings
- regenerate narrowed unit scope
- retry with updated constraints
Outputs
- RFC execution log
- unit scorecards
- dependency graph snapshot
- integration risk summary
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 68 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 3564f14e56b1
ralphinho-rfc-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 343 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to ralphinho-rfc-pipeline, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
jira
Jira project management expert for issues, sprints, workflows, and reporting.
linear-tools
Linear project management expert for issues, cycles, projects, and workflow automation.
create-issue
Create a GitHub issue with a drafted title and body. Use when the user asks to "create an issue", "file an issue", "open an issue", "submit an issue", "report a bug", "file a bug report", "file a feature request", or "file a design proposal".
pick-next-issue
Fetch and rank open GitHub issues by community engagement, present the top 3 candidates, and plan implementation for the selected issue. Use when the user asks to "pick next issue", "next issue", "which issue should I work on", "top issues", "most popular issues", "prioritize issues", or "what should I work on next".
produck-feedback
Use when acting on real user feedback — you have a Produck feedback ticket or URL, or the user wants to fix something users complained about or build a feature users asked for. Pulls full feedback context through the Produck MCP and drives a feedback → aligned PRD → build loop. Triggers on "fix what users reported", a…
workspace-builder
Build ServiceNow App Engine Studio applications — sysscope creation, scoped tables, sysawworkspace with lists/forms, the sysux record chain behind UI Builder workspaces, data brokers, and application export readiness checks. Never create a UI Builder page by inserting a sysuxpage row.