Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS --skill springboot-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiang213/OpenClaw-MASWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/springboot-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/springboot-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiang213/openclaw-mas/springboot-verification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01418 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00709 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
springboot-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- springboot-verification — 100% identical, 3 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spring Boot Verification Loop
Run before PRs, after major changes, and pre-deploy.
When to Activate
- Before opening a pull request for a Spring Boot service
- After major refactoring or dependency upgrades
- Pre-deployment verification for staging or production
- Running full build → lint → test → security scan pipeline
- Validating test coverage meets thresholds
Phase 1: Build
mvn -T 4 clean verify -DskipTests
# or
./gradlew clean assemble -x test
If build fails, stop and fix.
Phase 2: Static Analysis
Maven (common plugins):
mvn -T 4 spotbugs:check pmd:check checkstyle:check
Gradle (if configured):
./gradlew checkstyleMain pmdMain spotbugsMain
Phase 3: Tests + Coverage
mvn -T 4 test
mvn jacoco:report # verify 80%+ coverage
# or
./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
Report:
- Total tests, passed/failed
- Coverage % (lines/branches)
Unit Tests
Test service logic in isolation with mocked dependencies:
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class UserServiceTest {
@Mock private UserRepository userRepository;
@InjectMocks private UserService userService;
@Test
void createUser_validInput_returnsUser() {
var dto = new CreateUserDto("Alice", "[email protected]");
var expected = new User(1L, "Alice", "[email protected]");
when(userRepository.save(any(User.class))).thenReturn(expected);
var result = userService.create(dto);
assertThat(result.name()).isEqualTo("Alice");
verify(userRepository).save(any(User.class));
}
@Test
void createUser_duplicateEmail_throwsException() {
var dto = new CreateUserDto("Alice", "[email protected]");
when(userRepository.existsByEmail(dto.email())).thenReturn(true);
assertThatThrownBy(() -> userService.create(dto))
.isInstanceOf(DuplicateEmailException.class);
}
}
Integration Tests with Testcontainers
Test against a real database instead of H2:
@SpringBootTest
@Testcontainers
class UserRepositoryIntegrationTest {
@Container
static PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgres = new PostgreSQLContainer<>("postgres:16-alpine")
.withDatabaseName("testdb");
@DynamicPropertySource
static void configureProperties(DynamicPropertyRegistry registry) {
registry.add("spring.datasource.url", postgres::getJdbcUrl);
registry.add("spring.datasource.username", postgres::getUsername);
registry.add("spring.datasource.password", postgres::getPassword);
}
@Autowired private UserRepository userRepository;
@Test
void findByEmail_existingUser_returnsUser() {
userRepository.save(new User("Alice", "[email protected]"));
var found = userRepository.findByEmail("[email protected]");
assertThat(found).isPresent();
assertThat(found.get().getName()).isEqualTo("Alice");
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 232 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 4895b880d86d
springboot-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiang213/OpenClaw-MAS (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,418 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fitness-function-design
Design metrics that measure architecture health (coupling, modularity, scalability). Automate fitness function checks in CI/CD. Use when establishing quality gates or measuring architectural degradation.
create-test-plan
Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plans/ .md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to "create a test plan", "plan tests", "what should I test", "generate test scenarios"…
secure-fuzz-testing
Expert-level skill for writing and integrating coverage-guided fuzz tests in Python, Rust, and Go for secure code validation in English and Indonesian.
pentest-exploit-validation
Proof-driven exploitation with 4-level evidence system, bypass exhaustion protocol, mandatory evidence checklists, and strict EXPLOITED/POTENTIAL/FALSEPOSITIVE classification.
eval
Quality and performance evaluation with baseline comparison. Sub-modes: correctness, performance, quality, regression. Outputs PASS/WARN/FAIL per dimension. Use for pre-ship evaluation or regression checks.
go
Go phase. Reads the approved SPEC file, maps Requirements to tasks (plan), executes via TDD (build), and integrates results verifying all Acceptance Criteria.