Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill agent-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00174 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00070 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
agent-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
agent-check
This page used to hold an archived copy of this skill. The archive now lives in the registry's data repository.
- Archived SKILL.md (snapshot from 2026-10-08)
- Find this skill in Claude Skills Registry
- Request removal
This pointer keeps old links working. It is not an installable skill.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -242 lines · -44 tokens per session d8d380e652f3
- 1mo ago First seen · 252 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 36833e5ad3d8
agent-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiayu000/claude-skill-registry (690 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 174 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-code-review-swarm
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm.
agent-code-review-swarm
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm.
comments-docs
Reviews comment quality and documentation practices: the four comment types, comments-first workflow, and comment rot. Use when reviewing comments or docs, when comments just repeat the code, or when something is hard to describe in a sentence. Not for naming or code obviousness (use naming-obviousness).
complexity-recognition
Diagnoses whether complexity exists and where it comes from, using the three-symptom, two-root-cause framework. Use when code feels harder to work with than it should but the specific problem is unclear. Not for scanning known design smells (use red-flags) or evaluating a module's depth (use deep-modules).
pull-complexity-down
Checks whether complexity is pushed to callers or absorbed by implementations — the direction complexity flows. Use when callers must do significant setup, handle errors the module could resolve, or configure things they don't understand. Not for module depth (use deep-modules), knowledge leakage (use…
abstraction-quality
Evaluates whether abstractions provide a genuinely different way of thinking or are structurally shallow. Use when adjacent layers feel redundant, wrappers add boilerplate without depth, or an abstraction feels leaky. Not for a single module's interface-to-implementation ratio (use deep-modules) or information leakage…