Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add makifbaysal/tasktrooper --skill flutter-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/makifbaysal/tasktrooperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/flutter-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/flutter-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/flutter-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/flutter-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/flutter-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01157 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00463 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00231 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flutter Testing
Overview
Test-first in Flutter (see tdd-workflow). Three layers, each for a different question: does the logic work, does the widget behave, does it look right.
Core principle: Most tests are fast unit + widget tests. Golden tests guard appearance; integration tests guard whole flows — use them sparingly.
Test layers
| Layer | Question | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Does the controller/logic compute correctly? | flutter_test, mock the repository |
| Widget | Does the widget render state and respond to taps? | testWidgets + pumpWidget + finders |
| Golden | Does it match the approved pixels? | matchesGoldenFile |
| Integration | Does the whole flow work on a device? | integration_test |
Widget test example
testWidgets('shows error view and retries', (tester) async {
final controller = FakeTaskController()..emitError('boom');
await tester.pumpWidget(wrap(TaskListScreen(controller: controller)));
await tester.pump();
expect(find.text('boom'), findsOneWidget);
await tester.tap(find.byType(RetryButton));
await tester.pump();
expect(controller.loadCalled, isTrue); // intent reached the controller
});
Rules
- Unit-test controllers/logic without pumping a widget — that's the payoff of keeping logic out of widgets (see flutter-state-management).
- Widget tests assert observable behavior (text visible, tap triggers intent), not internal structure.
- Mock the repository/ports, not the widget under test. Prefer a hand-written fake or
mocktailper the app's convention. - Golden tests: commit the golden, review changes deliberately; regenerate only when the change is intended.
- Cover loading, data, empty, and error states — the branches most likely to ship broken.
pumpvspumpAndSettle: usepumpfor controlled frames,pumpAndSettleto drain animations — never rely on real timers.
Matrix test: size, text scale, dark mode
A widget test that only runs at the default size and text scale misses the most common mobile layout bug — overflow at larger text scales. See mobile-visual-self-review for the full size matrix and the worked PriceRow example (verified: passes at text scale 1.0 everywhere, overflows by 82px at 360×640/2.0). The shape:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 98 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f4a083841987
flutter-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository makifbaysal/tasktrooper (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,157 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
nemo-automodel-model-onboarding
Guide for onboarding new model architectures into NeMo AutoModel, including architecture discovery, implementation patterns, registration, and validation.
nemo-automodel-recipe-development
Create and modify NeMo AutoModel training and evaluation recipes, including YAML structure, builders, and execution flow.
mcore-testing
Test system for Megatron-LM. Covers test layout, recipe YAML structure, adding and running unit and functional tests, golden values, marker filters, and CI parity.
i4h-catheter-navigation-e2e
End-to-end smoke for catheter navigation covering setup, digital twin, DRR, and unit tests. Use when asked to run the full catheter workflow smoke or demo the v0.7 pipeline.
android-emulator
Verify and debug native, React Native, Expo, or Flutter apps on an Android Emulator with agent-device. Use when an agent needs to launch an app, inspect its live UI, tap, type, scroll, validate a code change, collect failure evidence, or reproduce a workflow on an Android virtual device.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.