mobile-visual-self-review

mobile-visual-self-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from makifbaysal/tasktrooper. It costs 57 tokens per session (2,281 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A checklist and test approach for reviewing a mobile screen after changing it. It combines automated checks with looking at the rendered screen on different phone and tablet sizes, text scales, orientations, and dark mode.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Flutter, SwiftUI, or Compose screens across device sizes, font scales, landscape mode, tablets, and dark mode.
Why use it?
A successful build or widget test checks code and selected behaviour, but may miss clipped text, invisible colours, or broken layouts. This catches visual problems before handoff.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review Flutter, SwiftUI, or Compose screens across device sizes, font scales, landscape mode, tablets, and dark mode.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add makifbaysal/tasktrooper --skill mobile-visual-self-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/makifbaysal/tasktrooper

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for mobile-visual-self-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for mobile-visual-self-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/mobile-visual-self-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,281 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.02281
Opus 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00912
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00456
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00228

Measured 6d ago against content hash 4e2ae00ccd59, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mobile-visual-self-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

catalog/agents/mobile-developer/skills/mobile-visual-self-review/SKILL.md · 132 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Mobile Visual Self-Review

Overview

A green build and a passing widget test say the code compiles and the tree is what the test asserted. Neither says the screen looks right on a 360 phone at 200% text, on a tablet, in landscape, or in dark mode. Default assumption: the change is NOT done until you've looked at it rendered — be the skeptic here, not the advocate.

Core principle: two layers, always both. A matrix test in the suite catches overflow mechanically on every future change; looking at the rendered screen catches what a test assertion can't (a placeholder glyph, a clipped icon, invisible text in dark mode).

The matrix

360×640 (phone) · 430×932 (large phone) · 640×360 landscape · 768×1024 (tablet) — each at text scale 1.0 and 2.0, and in dark mode.

Layer 1 — a matrix test in the repo's test suite

Flutter (verified, Flutter 3.41.6 — 11/11 green after the fix below):

const sizes = <String, Size>{
  'phone 360x640': Size(360, 640),
  'large phone 430x932': Size(430, 932),
  'landscape 640x360': Size(640, 360),
  'tablet 768x1024': Size(768, 1024),
};

for (final e in sizes.entries) {
  for (final scale in [1.0, 2.0]) {
    testWidgets('PriceRow at ${e.key}, text x$scale, dark', (tester) async {
      tester.view.physicalSize = e.value * 3;
      tester.view.devicePixelRatio = 3;
      tester.platformDispatcher.textScaleFactorTestValue = scale;
      addTearDown(tester.view.reset);
      addTearDown(tester.platformDispatcher.clearAllTestValues);
      final handle = tester.ensureSemantics();
      await tester.pumpWidget(host(PriceRow(title: longRealisticTitle, price: '1.299,00 TL', onAdd: () {}),
          brightness: Brightness.dark));
      expect(tester.takeException(), isNull);                        // overflow = FlutterError here
      await expectLater(tester, meetsGuideline(androidTapTargetGuideline));
      await expectLater(tester, meetsGuideline(iOSTapTargetGuideline));
      await expectLater(tester, meetsGuideline(labeledTapTargetGuideline));
      handle.dispose();
    });
  }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 132 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago Changed 4e2ae00ccd59
  2. 8d ago First seen · 132 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 36eb2971fd2a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mobile-visual-self-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository makifbaysal/tasktrooper (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,281 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.