Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add makifbaysal/tasktrooper --skill post-analiz-handoffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/makifbaysal/tasktrooperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-analiz-handoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-analiz-handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-analiz-handoff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-analiz-handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-analiz-handoff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00923 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
post-analiz-handoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Post-Analiz Handoff
Overview
The analiz has a human approval gate. The system-architect does NOT create implementation tasks when it finishes analysis — it presents the plan in the analiz_review column, the human approves it, and only then does the architect create the tasks. Your job is to understand this sequence and review the tasks after they appear, not to create them.
The sequence (who does what)
- Architect writes the spec/plan and moves the analiz task to
analiz_review, then stops. - Human reviews the plan in
analiz_reviewand moves it todone(approve) orneed_revision(reject). This is the human's decision, not yours — do not move an analiz task out ofanaliz_review. - Architect (on approval) creates one implementation task per project, lists them in a comment, and moves the analiz task to
released.
Your steps
Trigger: the stakeholder asks what an analysis found, or about the tasks it produced. The board never dispatches you here on its own — the PM is subscribed only to pm_uat, so this skill only runs when a human brings it up in chat.
list_board_tasksto find the implementation tasks the architect created.- Read the architect's spec/plan with
list_task_documentson the ANALIZ task — they are documents attached to it, never committed to the repository — and read the task comments. - Check each created task carries
derived_frompointing at the analiz task.update_board_taskcannot setderived_from— it has no such field and silently ignores it. If the task has not started (backlog/todo/blocked),delete_board_task+create_board_taskit withderived_fromset, keeping its title, fields and criteria. If work has already started,add_task_comment: "Spec and plan:list_task_documents A-N" — so the developer can still reach them without touching a task mid-flight. - Check the order is declared, not just described. A frontend task that consumes a new endpoint should carry
blocked_byanddeploy_depends_onnaming the backend task; a "Depends on: …" sentence in the description enforces nothing.update_board_taskCAN add toblocked_by/deploy_depends_on(it adds to whatever is already there) — use it for tasks still in backlog/todo/blocked. - If stakeholder decisions were logged as questions during analysis, confirm answers exist.
- Review scope and priority. Edit acceptance criteria with
update_board_taskonly on tasks still inbacklog/todo/blocked— it replaces the whole array and resets every tick. On a task that has started, usecancel_criterionto drop one, or open a new task for added scope (see scope-management); never duplicate or re-create the architect's tasks. - Tell the stakeholder which implementation tasks are queued, in what order, and what happens next. A task sitting in
blockedbecause its blocker is still open is on schedule, not stuck — it is picked up automatically.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 43 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 9d16918eba7e
post-analiz-handoff is a skill published in the GitHub repository makifbaysal/tasktrooper (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 923 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
paperclip
Use for Paperclip-managed tasks and heartbeats: reading task context, delivering task documents or files, updating completion or blockers, coordinating or delegating work, and following company governance. Includes control plane API operations for assignments, comments, approvals, and routines.
paperclip
Interact with the Paperclip control plane API for task coordination and governance. Use when checking assignments, updating issue status, posting comments, delegating work, managing routines, or calling Paperclip API endpoints.
paperclip-board
Manage a Paperclip company as a board member via chat. Use when the user wants onboarding, company or agent management, approvals, task monitoring, cost oversight, or work product review in the Paperclip control plane.
paperclip-distill
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill. Turn source-bundled Paperclip activity into wiki-insightful project standups, durable project pages, decisions, and history without asset dereferencing.
summarize-status
Write a short, colloquial summary for a Paperclip summary slot: open with the 1–3 specific, concrete actions the reader needs to take right now to unblock the work, then a brief plain-language status, streaming progress as it works.
paperclip-task-bridge
Create, comment on, update, and list Paperclip tasks from Hermes using scoped Paperclip API credentials.