Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add makifbaysal/tasktrooper --skill post-deploy-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/makifbaysal/tasktrooperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-deploy-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-deploy-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-deploy-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-deploy-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makifbaysal/tasktrooper/post-deploy-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01978 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00791 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
post-deploy-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Post-deploy verification
A deploy that went green tells you the process started. It says nothing about whether the change it shipped actually works, or whether it broke something else that happened to keep running. Verification is what closes that gap, and it happens every time — not only when something looks wrong.
1. Procedure — exact calls
get_release({ task_id })→ readdeployed_at,component,checks(health samples, smoke results,new_errors,notes,early_stop),profile.auto_rollback, andtasks[]— every task this release covers, not only the one you were woken on.get_environmentonly if you need to confirm nothing is bound (checks.notesalready says so in most cases).list_runtime_errors({ component, since: "<window that starts well before deployed_at>" })— see "Reading error groups" below for the window and how to judgenew.query_runtime_logs({ component, since: deployed_at, min_severity: "error" }); re-query withtext:set to a route or module the release changed when the error list alone is not enough.run_smoke_checks({ task_id })when the stored evidence is older than ~30 minutes, or whenearly_stopitself came from a smoke failure and you need a fresh read before deciding.- One read-only acceptance check per observable criterion of every task in
release.tasks(list_acceptance_criteriaper task) — a release with several tasks is verified in full, not just the card that woke you.
2. Reading error groups
list_runtime_errors' new: true is accurate on a provider with native grouping (gcloud). On a provider without one (Vercel, AWS — fallback fingerprint grouping), it only means "this group's first occurrence fell in the back half of whatever window you queried" — querying since: deployed_at puts a regression that starts right after the deploy in the window's front half, so it can read new: false and never show up as a concern.
- Judge a group by its own
first_seenagainstrelease.deployed_at, never bynewalone. - Read with a window that starts well before
deployed_at— roughly twice the time elapsed since the deploy, or at least the soak period — so an occurrence from before the deploy is visible and can be told apart from one that started with it. - Before rolling back on one low-count group, re-read with
since: "1d". If the same message recurs beforedeployed_at, it is chronic, not a regression. Once you have confirmed a group is chronic and unrelated to any release,save_memory(project scope) a one-line note of its fingerprint message ("redis timeoutin apps/api recurs hourly; not a release signal") so a future run of this skill recognizes it without a full 1-day re-read. checks.new_errors(the sweeper's own field) can be empty on Vercel or AWS even when errors genuinely began with the deploy — your own read in this run is the check, not a formality that confirms what the sweeper already decided.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 78 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 85369cb117a9
post-deploy-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository makifbaysal/tasktrooper (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,978 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-announcement
Write a release announcement — changelog, blog post, in-app note, or social post — that leads with user impact, names the audience, and includes upgrade/migration steps without filler.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
agent-performance-optimizer
Agent skill for performance-optimizer - invoke with $agent-performance-optimizer.
agent-refinement
Agent skill for refinement - invoke with $agent-refinement.
doca-flow
Build and debug DOCA Flow applications on supported NVIDIA NICs/DPUs: define match/action pipes, initialize ports and representors, choose forwarding targets, validate pipes before hardware programming, read counters, match the Flow version to the installed DOCA release, and diagnose Flow API errors. Trigger on DOCA…
dynamo-interconnect-check
Validate that a Dynamo deployment's NIXL/UCX/NCCL interconnect is ready for disaggregated serving over RDMA/NVLink. Use after recipe-runner brings a deployment up (especially disagg/multi-node) to confirm the KV transport is correct; use troubleshoot for diagnosing already-failed pods.