Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Maless88/Roadboard --skill cowork-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Maless88/RoadboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/maless88/roadboard/cowork-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maless88/roadboard/cowork-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maless88/roadboard/cowork-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maless88/roadboard/cowork-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maless88/roadboard/cowork-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01075 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
cowork-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cowork — prompt lifecycle + review gates
Worker-executable work lives as markdown prompt files under tasks/{todo,run,done} (gitignored). Move with plain mv — except run/→done/, which only promote may perform.
Prompt frontmatter (MANDATORY)
---
status: draft # draft | in-review | changes-requested | approved | blocked-review
review_round: 0 # incremented on each resubmission
# --- output-gate fields (populated after the Worker runs) ---
output_status: none # none | pending | approved | changes-requested | blocked-review
output_round: 0 # incremented by review-output on each verdict
verification: # filled by `promote` (build/tests) and by the Worker (evidence)
build: unknown # unknown | pass | fail
tests: unknown # unknown | pass | fail
evidence: "" # path to screenshot/log; required for UI tasks
---
A Worker is spawned ONLY when status: approved. A prompt reaches done/ ONLY when output_status: approved + build/tests green + evidence satisfied. Filesystem + frontmatter are the single source of truth.
Review gate (before any Worker execution)
- Architect drafts the prompt in
tasks/todo/(status: draft,review_round: 0). - Architect submits it (
status: in-review) to the Analyst (a review step — in the single-agent chatboard this is a dedicated review pass / a security-or-review agent like Argo, not a third session-role). - Analyst writes a verdict (
approved/changes-requested) into the frontmatter and APPENDS one round to## Review log(never overwrites prior rounds). changes-requested→ Architect revises in place,review_round++,status: in-review, resubmit.approved→ proceed to execute.- Loop cap: after 3 rounds without
approved→status: blocked-review, escalate to the developer.
Analyst defaults to changes-requested when the prompt is ambiguous/under-specified/unverifiable/risky. Approval is earned. Analyst never writes code or moves files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 0b0d88f27820
cowork-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Maless88/Roadboard (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,075 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
install-isingq-mcp
Install, update, connect, or diagnose IsingQ tools through standard MCP, Codex Plugin, or the native DeepSeek Harness Plugin. Use when a user wants IsingQ available in an Agent Host.
use-404-directory
Preflight a specific Polymarket observation or contemplated Yes/No action for settlement, timing, liquidity, slippage, geoblock, and execution risk; also assess an unfamiliar third-party Agent tool before installation or first use. Use when an exact Polymarket market reference or actual external-tool action is…
xcatcher
Fetch fresh or recent public X (Twitter) posts from one or many named account handles through Xcatcher, with structured JSON results and optional x402 v2 USDC pay-per-crawl access on Base. Use for account monitoring, social intelligence, OSINT, tweet/post collection, timeline snapshots, or requests to scrape, crawl…
mcp-gateway
Use when discovering or calling downstream tools through MCP Gateway without loading every tool schema.
suno-music
Use Suno through Ace Data Cloud in goose for Suno music, lyrics and covers. Use the installed service MCP tools; query the original task ID after generation. This plugin is maintained by Ace Data Cloud, not the service brand's official plugin.
gpt-image
Use GPT Image through Ace Data Cloud in goose for GPT Image generation and image editing. Use the installed service MCP tools; query the original task ID after generation. This plugin is maintained by Ace Data Cloud, not the service brand's official plugin.