app-recommender

app-recommender is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from malue-ai/dazee-small. It costs 28 tokens per session (773 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An application recommender that matches a user’s task with suitable software, giving priority to built-in or already installed apps before suggesting free or paid alternatives.

In plain words
What is it for?
Finding software for tasks such as editing images, working with PDFs, writing documents, making presentations, editing video, or coding.
Why use it?
It removes the guesswork from choosing which application to use for a specific job.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Finding software for tasks such as editing images, working with PDFs, writing documents, making presentations, editing video, or coding.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add malue-ai/dazee-small --skill app-recommender
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/malue-ai/dazee-small

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for app-recommender

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for app-recommender

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malue-ai/dazee-small/app-recommender.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 773 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.00773
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00387
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00155
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00077

Measured 8d ago against content hash 386e71433676, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

app-recommender scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

instances/xiaodazi/skills/app-recommender/SKILL.md · 90 lines

What it actually says

应用推荐

根据用户任务需求,结合已安装的应用(通过 app-scanner),推荐最合适的软件。

使用场景

  • 用户说「我想编辑一张图片,用什么软件好」
  • 用户说「有没有免费的视频剪辑工具推荐」
  • 任务执行中需要某类应用但不确定推荐哪个

工作流程

用户需求(如「编辑 PDF」)
    ↓
1. 调用 app-scanner 获取已安装应用列表
    ↓
2. 匹配已安装应用中能满足需求的
    ↓
3. 如果有多个匹配 → 按优先级推荐
   如果无匹配 → 推荐安装方案
    ↓
4. 输出推荐结果

推荐优先级

  1. 系统自带应用(免费、无需安装)
  2. 用户已安装的应用(已有,直接用)
  3. 免费开源应用(推荐安装)
  4. 付费应用(说明价格和优势)

常见需求 → 推荐映射

macOS

需求 系统自带 推荐免费 推荐付费
看/标注 PDF Preview Skim PDF Expert
编辑图片 Preview, Photos GIMP Pixelmator Pro
写文档 TextEdit, Pages LibreOffice Word
做表格 Numbers LibreOffice Excel
做 PPT Keynote LibreOffice PowerPoint
剪视频 iMovie DaVinci Resolve Final Cut Pro
写代码 - VS Code -
画图/设计 - Figma (Web) Sketch
录屏 Screenshot (Cmd+Shift+5) OBS ScreenFlow
压缩文件 Archive Utility Keka BetterZip
看 Markdown - MacDown Typora
终端 Terminal iTerm2 -

Windows

需求 系统自带 推荐免费 推荐付费
看 PDF Edge SumatraPDF Adobe Acrobat
编辑图片 Paint GIMP Photoshop
写文档 WordPad LibreOffice Word
剪视频 Clipchamp DaVinci Resolve Premiere
写代码 Notepad VS Code -
录屏 Xbox Game Bar OBS Camtasia

通用(跨平台)

需求 推荐免费 推荐付费
笔记 Obsidian, Notion Bear
任务管理 Trello, Todoist Things
密码管理 Bitwarden 1Password
邮件 Thunderbird Spark
浏览器 Firefox, Chrome Arc

输出规范

  • 先推荐用户已安装的(「你电脑上有 Preview,可以直接用它打开」)
  • 如果需要安装,给出一步命令(brew install xxx 或 App Store 链接)
  • 说人话,不堆参数(「iMovie 够用了,免费的,系统自带」)
  • 付费应用注明价格范围
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 90 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 386e71433676

Subscribe to this mod's changes

app-recommender is a skill published in the GitHub repository malue-ai/dazee-small (36 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.