Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill sepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/sep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/sep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/sep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/sep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/sep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01319 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
sep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- dotnet-sep — 91% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sep for .NET separated values
Trigger On
- delimited data needs are performance-sensitive and allocation-aware
- project needs explicit control over separator inference, escaping, trimming, and header behavior
- reading/writing large or long-lived file pipelines in ML, ETL, or analytics workloads
- startup/perf tests require AOT/trimming-friendly CSV/TSV processing
Install
- NuGet:
dotnet add package Sepdotnet add package Sep --version <version>
- XML package reference:
<PackageReference Include="Sep" Version="x.y.z" />
- Verify baseline support by checking the package page:
- Source:
Workflow
flowchart LR
A[Input source: file/text/stream] --> B[Sep.Reader or Sep.New(...).Reader]
B --> C[SepReaderOptions]
C --> D[Rows -> Cols -> Span/Parse]
D --> E[Transform and validate]
E --> F[SepWriter via SepWriterOptions]
F --> G[To file/text output]
- Decide schema shape
- header present or no header
- separator known (
;,,, tab, custom) or infer from first row - row/column quoting rules
- Build reader with
Sep.Reader(...)and explicit options only where needed:Sep.Reader()for inferred separator from header-like first rowSep.New(',').Reader(...)for explicit separator modeSep.Reader(o => o with { HasHeader = false })if header is absent
- Read rows and map columns as
ReadOnlySpan<char>first, convert only when needed. - For output, use
reader.Spec.Writer()when you need the same separator/culture as input. - Control writer behavior with
Sep.Writer(...)andSepWriterOptions(WriteHeader,Escape,DisableColCountCheck). - Add async only where it brings value and your runtime is C# 13 / .NET 9+ for
await foreachover async reader rows. - Use
ParallelEnumeratefor CPU-heavy transformations only after benchmarking single-threaded baseline.
Install and read patterns
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 537a3231dc6d
sep is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/dotnet-skills (490 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,319 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gpt-image-2
A skill for generating or editing images with GPT Image 2 across local, host-provided, or advisory setups.
LQF_Machine_Learning_Expert_Guide
LQF Machine Learning Expert Guide - Routed skill for ML/Statistical Modeling with Critical Discussion Mode. Triggers on: machine learning, modeling, prediction, training, classification, regression, clustering, deep learning, neural network, model evaluation, feature engineering, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting…
nowait-reasoning-optimizer
Implements the NOWAIT technique for efficient reasoning in R1-style LLMs. Use when optimizing inference of reasoning models (QwQ, DeepSeek-R1, Phi4-Reasoning, Qwen3, Kimi-VL, QvQ), reducing chain-of-thought token usage by 27-51% while preserving accuracy. Triggers on "optimize reasoning", "reduce thinking tokens"…
vss-benchmark-vlm-qa
Benchmark video Q&A accuracy and latency of a deployed RT-VLM (Cosmos Reason 3) via vss vlm run, using questions and videos from the DSS vss-devx-base dataset. Replaces the deprecated nat eval / vss-agent QA path. Not for tool-calling or trajectory evaluation, and not for LVS summarization throughput.
ai-ethics-review
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety…
llm-cost-latency-budget
Model the cost and latency of an LLM feature before it ships and surprises the bill. Use when asked to estimate LLM API costs, set a latency/token budget, decide which model tier to use, or bring down the cost of an AI feature. Produces a cost & latency budget — token math per request, monthly cost projection, model…