Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill stylecop-analyzersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/stylecop-analyzers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/stylecop-analyzers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/stylecop-analyzers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/stylecop-analyzers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/stylecop-analyzers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00142 | $0.01053 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00057 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
stylecop-analyzers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
5 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- mcaf-dotnet-stylecop-analyzers — 97% identical, 10 lines differ
- mcaf-dotnet-stylecop-analyzers — 97% identical, 10 lines differ
- dotnet-stylecop-analyzers — 94% identical, 10 lines differ
- stylecop-analyzers — 94% identical, 8 lines differ
- dotnet-stylecop-analyzers — 92% identical, 12 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
StyleCop Analyzers
Trigger On
- the repo wants
StyleCop.Analyzers - naming, layout, or documentation style needs stronger enforcement
- the team needs
stylecop.jsonguidance
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- repos that intentionally rely only on SDK analyzers
- repos where
StyleCopoverlaps too heavily with an existing style package and no consolidation is planned
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - current
.editorconfig - any existing
stylecop.json
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Add
StyleCop.Analyzersonly if the repo wants its opinionated style rules. - Keep severity in the root
.editorconfig. - Use
stylecop.jsononly for StyleCop-specific behavioral options. - Prefer one checked-in
stylecop.jsonper repo unless a project genuinely needs its own behavior. - Avoid rule duplication with SDK analyzers or other analyzer packs when possible.
Bootstrap When Missing
If StyleCop.Analyzers is not configured yet:
- Detect current state:
rg -n "StyleCop\\.Analyzers|stylecop\\.json" -g '*.csproj' -g 'stylecop.json' .
- Add package to the intended scope:
dotnet add PROJECT.csproj package StyleCop.Analyzers
- Keep severity in root
.editorconfigand usestylecop.jsononly for StyleCop-specific behavior. - Prevent overlap with existing analyzer packs by defining ownership.
- Run
dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECTand returnstatus: configuredorstatus: improved. - If the repo intentionally uses SDK analyzers only, return
status: not_applicable.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 108 lines · 142 tokens per session scan A 0e9436e1d8b4
stylecop-analyzers is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/dotnet-skills (492 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 142 tokens to every session and 1,053 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
clean-architecture-dotnet
Use when domain logic leaks into API/Infrastructure, project references violate layer boundaries, or you need to decide between CQS (always), CQRS bus (complex domains), and DDD patterns (invariants and events).
creating-dotnet-mcp-servers
Use when building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers in .NET, configuring tools, transports (SSE/stdio), JSON serialization for AOT, or testing MCP endpoints.
opengis-skills
Use when AI coding assistant needs GIS/CAD/C#/AI/IoT/3D domain expertise. Index of 96 skills across 8 categories: gis (32), cad (21), csharp (9), ai (14), iot (2), 3d (6), demos (4), others (8). Tag-based search and on-demand loading for GDAL, GeoServer, MapServer, Leaflet, PROJ, PostGIS, JTS, CesiumJS, FreeCAD…
dotnet-inspect
Query .NET APIs across NuGet packages, platform libraries, and local files. Search for types, list API surfaces, compare and diff versions, find extension methods and implementors. Use whenever you need to answer questions about .NET library contents. Commands pin v0.9.1; pair with cs0618-hunter (compiler-based) for…
maf-migration-retrospective
Post-migration learning skill. After a migration completes, reads the migration plan notes, build history, and surprises to improve the registry, guide, and constraint rules. Invoked as the final step of any migration. This is how the toolkit gets smarter with each use.
maf-migration-plan-creator
Generates a complete, ready-to-execute MAF migration plan (migration-plan.md) for any .NET codebase. Used by @maf-auditor (which calls this skill after scanning to produce the plan). Use this skill directly when no migration plan exists yet, or when the existing plan needs to be regenerated after a codebase audit.…